shrimants
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2006
- Posts
- 1,176
- Likes
- 81
Can someone, using a mildly electrical/computer engineering and physics populated vocabulary, please explain the difference between these 3 types of drivers?
Ribbon vs Electrostat vs Planar Magnetic
- Thread starter shrimants
- Start date
liamstrain
Member of the Trade: The Audio Guild
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Posts
- 3,692
- Likes
- 261
Ribbon and Planar magnetic are variations of the same thing.
A thin metal film (or metal impregnated pattern in a thin plastic film) - connected to the signal - is suspended between to opposing plates of magnets. As charge is applied, the film moves en masse back and forth within that suspension - generating sound.
--
An electrostatic driver uses two electrically charged (high voltage) stators in place of the magnets from above - with a coated mylar or other thin film between them which is coated with something that gives it a high surface resistivity - suspending the film between the stators in a static electric field that when the audio signal is applied to the stators (anti-phase - positive on one side, negative on the other) it pushes and pulls the film back and forth generating sound.
-
So in one the signal is applied to the film between magnets, and the other the signal is applied to charged stators on either side of the film. In both the sound is generated by the movement of a low mass, high surface area thin film moving back and forth in a flat plane.
A thin metal film (or metal impregnated pattern in a thin plastic film) - connected to the signal - is suspended between to opposing plates of magnets. As charge is applied, the film moves en masse back and forth within that suspension - generating sound.
--
An electrostatic driver uses two electrically charged (high voltage) stators in place of the magnets from above - with a coated mylar or other thin film between them which is coated with something that gives it a high surface resistivity - suspending the film between the stators in a static electric field that when the audio signal is applied to the stators (anti-phase - positive on one side, negative on the other) it pushes and pulls the film back and forth generating sound.
-
So in one the signal is applied to the film between magnets, and the other the signal is applied to charged stators on either side of the film. In both the sound is generated by the movement of a low mass, high surface area thin film moving back and forth in a flat plane.
shrimants
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2006
- Posts
- 1,176
- Likes
- 81
Thank you very much. How about some sound characteristics and advantages/disadvantages of each?
liamstrain
Member of the Trade: The Audio Guild
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Posts
- 3,692
- Likes
- 261
That I'll have to leave to others to fill out. I have very little experience actually listening to them.
Quote:
I had the same (initial) question as you a while back and found some pretty good links:
http://www.innerfidelity.com/content/how-planar-magnetic-headphones-work
http://electronics.howstuffworks.com/question713.htm
It seems that ES is lighter and thus faster. But it doesn't move far (think how much a tweeter moves compared to a woofer) so it can't push big volumes of air; thus bass is usually a challenge for these drivers.
Users who are viewing this thread
