jc9394
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2006
- Posts
- 5,921
- Likes
- 60
Is it possible to get both SE and balanced out?
Originally Posted by oldwine /img/forum/go_quote.gif Donald, Is the 220v transformer now solved to build the 220-240v version? it is poor for us hearing only 12v is available. |
Originally Posted by minimus /img/forum/go_quote.gif My initial impression is that the DNA Sonett definitely has a SET-like presentation that some may really like but others may find slightly foreign, especially if they are used to relatively dark-sounding solid state amps. The Sonett offers an engrossing (yes, "euphonic") midrange and a detailed, textured high end. So far, however, I don't find the bass presentation to be quite as convincing as the mid-range and high end presentation. But I am still experimenting with ICs and power cords to see how those affect the sound signature of the amp. Any suggestions? I have tried power cords from Shunyata and Audio Arts. My IC's are Gabriel Gold Revelations. The amp is sitting on a Mapleshade Samson audio rack (basically, an extremely solid rack of 2" thick dried maple platforms), so vibration damping has been adequately addressed. |
Originally Posted by Rdr. Seraphim /img/forum/go_quote.gif By the way Minimus, I'm not sure if you've tried your JH16's with the Sonett yet, but another Head-fi'er with the JH13's has indicate that the combination is stunning! Love to hear your thoughts on the 16's and the Sonett! |
Originally Posted by AppleheadMay /img/forum/go_quote.gif @Seraphim: Thanks for the link, I was just going to call my favorite music store to order the CD. I'll have to download it in Flac and convert to AIFF though, I see most of their albums are Flac only. @Minimus: Thanks for your opnion on the Sonett too. I do like a somewhat euphonic midrange and of course detail in the high end. As for bass, I like deep bass as long as it remains well controlled and defined. I don't like bass getting muddy or "bloomed". Has your Sonett already been burned in enough? I ask because you are talking about "initial impressions". Maybe the bass might improve still? |
Originally Posted by AppleheadMay /img/forum/go_quote.gif Hi Seraphim, Yes, I only have a Mac. I have always been using Max, but I just googled for XLD. I'll give it a try. Do you find it has any advantages in audio quality over Max? I am busy ripping all my CD's to a NAS in uncompressed or losless format. I use a PSAudio Perfectwave Dac and am waiting for the "Bridge" plugin card, kind of a network card that lets the dac read every format straight from an NAS. So I want to store my files in the highest quality possible and rip them in the best way possible. |
Originally Posted by Rdr. Seraphim /img/forum/go_quote.gif I was looking for the most EAC equivalent product under OS X. XLD is continually being updated (just downloaded the latest this a.m.), whereas MAX, well, got max'd out in 2009. |
Originally Posted by Rdr. Seraphim /img/forum/go_quote.gif FLAC is pretty much FLAC, and I haven't bothered to question the SQ of the algorithm. However, I have experienced some differences in players, e.g. iTunes, Vox, Cog, Pure Music and Amarra. |