REVIEW: Denon AH-D5000 (56k beware)
Apr 9, 2007 at 10:30 PM Thread Starter Post #1 of 562

Skylab

Reviewerus Prolificus
Joined
Apr 30, 2005
Posts
21,807
Likes
1,045
Location
The Court of the Crimson King
I have been posting a lot about the new Denon AH-D5000’s, and have spent a lot of time with them over the past few days. Since their sound hasn’t changed much since the 25 hour mark, and as the have over 80 hours on them now, I feel confident in organizing my thoughts a little better, and putting them in one place. If you have been following the “Denon Woody” thread, much of this will be a repeat, but some of it will be new.

This is the link to Denon’s website, if you read Japanese:

http://www.denon.co.jp/company/relea...2000_1000.html

I bought the D5000’s from Pricejapan.com for $553 shipped via DHL express. I received them within one week of order. Some immediate things I noticed:

1.They are perhaps the most comfortable headphone I have ever worn. I always thought Beyerdynamic headphones were unbeatable in this regard. The Beyers are supremely comfortable, but they clamp a little more, and are a little heavier, than the Denons. Note that I don't find leather "hot" like some people, though, and all my Beyers have leather pads.

2.While these are closed, the seal is not too good, but it isn't sensitive to placement in the ear. The way the earpads are there is really only one way for it to go over the ear, unlike a Beyer or AKG headphone where it surrounds the ear so much that it can be slid back and forth quite a bit, which does effect balance. They do not isolate as well as the 06 DT770's – a notable amount less. They are certainly not going to bother anyone next to you, but they do not block out tons of external sound.

3.They are very light, and they are much smaller in depth than the JVC DX1000 (but about the same diameter).

4.These could NEVER be used un-amped. I know the specs say 25 ohm and 106db sensitivity, but to get the same volume level as an 80 ohm Darth Beyer required 30% more crank from my Meier Opera.

5.The cable is not microphonic at all, unlike the JVC DX1000 where the cable transmits quite a bit of noise to the headphone.

6.The driver sits VERY close to the ear, which undoubtedly has a lot to do with why there is a somewhat forward presentation.

7.The wood is very pretty, but not the most beautiful I have ever seen. It's most like Wenge - very dark brown wood with very little red in it. Pics below. The leather earpads and headband are awesome and very supple. Again, easily the most comfortable headphone I have ever worn.

Pictures:

DSC01293.jpg

DSC01294.jpg


Sound Quality

Overall, they sound very, very good. Very open mids, deep, well defined bass, and clear, clean, treble. This is not to say they are the best thing I have ever heard, but they are easily worth $500.

The highs are smooth, and there is quite a bit of treble energy - well extended and nicely detailed. I would not describe it as bright, but it isn’t laid back in the treble, either, though. It suits the overall response well. The treble is also quite transparent, which gives it a very open, natural quality.

Midrange is just slightly on the forward side of neutral, but highly transparent, and not edgy at all. The midrange is very alluring. I normally prefer a more relaxed midrange presentation, but because the Denons have powerful bass, the slightly forward mids do not make them annoying. There is enough bass power to balance the slightly forward midrange, and the transparency of the midrange make it very engaging. There is no glare, harshness or grain.

The D5000s have robust, powerful bass. They are headphones that a bass lover (like me) can really enjoy. The bass is not as strong as the older DT770’s, but on par with the new ones, and a little better in quality. Bass articulation, definition, and attack are very good, and way above average. It does bass very well, since the quantity is plentiful, and the quality of that robust bass is VERY good.

For soundstage...the D5000 has a slightly smaller soundstage than any of my Beyer headphones. It is less wide and less deep. However, image specificity is excellent - maybe a little better than any of my Beyer headphones. So there is a bit of a trade-off there.

I have listened to the Denons on a variety of headphone amps: Meier Audio Opera, Aria, HA-2 II/SE, and Singlepower PPX3, and ASL OTL mk III. I liked the Denons best on the Opera and Singlepower. I like a warm sounding headphone, and on the HA-2 and Aria I wanted just a little more warmth. The PPX3 did the trick for sure, and I swear everything seems to sound its best on the Opera
biggrin.gif
.

Comparisons

DSCN0466.jpg


For obvious reasons, I did some extensive comparisons to the JVC DX1000. These are both excellent headphones. The JVC has the deepest bass I have ever heard from a headphone, and the Denon didn't best it there. The Denon's bass is a little more robust overall, and both have among the very best in terms of bass articulation, definition, and speed for cans with a good amount of bass.

The Denon, to me, has the more natural midrange. It really excels here. The JVC always had just a slight nasal coloration to the midrange that keeps it from being a very top tier can. The Denon has no such coloration. It probably has the most neutral midrange of any headphone I own, right up there with the DT880 and the K701's mids.

The treble is a toss up, and neither is perfect. The JVC lacks the last little bit of extension and air, but the Denon may have just a tiny bit of extra sparkle. This may disappear with even more break in. Both have excellent treble overall, however.

The Denon images better. The soundstage is about the same width and depth, and image specificity is better. But again, both are very good.

The Denons are also more comfortable, although the JVC's are just fine. But I put the Denon's on my 8 year old son's head, and the first thing he said was "these are so comfy"! They really are. It's hard to imagine how a headphone could be more comfortable than the D5000.

I like both of the Japanese woodies a lot, but I'd say that after about a dozen switchovers, it was clear to me that I prefer the Denon. YMMV of course.

EDIT: Over time, I changed my mind about the JVC's mids, and the Denon's imaging. The DX1000's mids are a slight bit unique, but in the end they have an incredibly musical presentation. And the JVC's imaging is more holographic than the D5000. In the end, I ended up preferring the DX1000, so much that I eventually sold the D5000.

I compared the D5000 to the DT880/600, using the ASL MG-Head OTL mkIII. These headphones sound more similar than the D5000 and the Darth Beyers do, or even JVC DX1000's do. The Denons have more bass output, and a slightly more forward midrange than the DT880. The DT880's sound a little smoother, have a slightly more refined treble, and have a better overall soundstage. I slightly prefer the DT880’s treble and midrange, and I prefer the bass of the Denon. But they are very close.

I further compared the D5000 to the DT990. The tonal quality is very different of course. The Denon has slightly forward mids, and the DT990 slightly recessed. This gives the DT990 the feeling of having both more bass and treble, of course. I think that the Denon's mids are just forward of neutral. The DT990's are just recessed of neutral. So they sound pretty different. But anyone who wants a headphone with punchy bass but more forward mids than the DT990 has would do well with the Denon. The articulation of bass on the Denon and DT990 are fairly comparable, with the Denon maybe having a slight edge.

Finally, I also compared to the Headphile Darth Beyers, and the Denons are pretty different sounding. The Denons have excellent bass, but less midbass than the DB's. The Denons have a more neutral midrange, though, and are the more "accurate" headphone overall. They also have more detail. It's very difficult for me to say which I like better. The Denons are the first headphone I have ever had that had a really neutral midrange and detailed treble but still had enough bass for me, and that's why I am pretty enamored with them. I like them for the same reasons I like the 2006 DT990's so much. But the Darth Beyers are so wonderful for a “relaxed listen”, that I still prefer them in some respects. They are essentially different enough that they are not going to appeal to the same person who has a strong preference in tonality. I am sure happy to have both!

So, to sum up, the AH-D5000 is a very high quality headphone with some outstanding qualities, and is a great listen. It will appeal to a large number of music lovers, and is very fairly, even attractively, priced. Well done, Denon!
 
Apr 9, 2007 at 10:39 PM Post #2 of 562
Great review! It would seem that the D5000 shares a bunch of qualities with the AD2000. We'll have to get the AD2000 and D5000 in the same room sometime to find out how they compare.
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Apr 9, 2007 at 10:51 PM Post #4 of 562
Just when I think I'm done buying headphones you have to post a review like this one! Damn it man! You are going to cost my poor wallet another $550!

Good stuff Skylab!
 
Apr 9, 2007 at 10:55 PM Post #5 of 562
Nice read, thanks!
smily_headphones1.gif


Now please do a review on the AH-D2000 (and the AH-D1000 for that matter)
biggrin.gif
 
Apr 9, 2007 at 11:01 PM Post #6 of 562
Excellent to have some firm impressions put down for these much awaited headphones. If I go looking for a closed back high end headphone. Itll definitely be a contender.
 
Apr 9, 2007 at 11:17 PM Post #7 of 562
Thanks all.

I have not owned HD650's in a long time, but I would say the Denons are in the same league as the HD650's, although they sound quite defferent from how I recall the 650s.

And someone else will have to review the D2000 - this is the only Denon I am buying
smily_headphones1.gif
 
Apr 10, 2007 at 12:09 AM Post #9 of 562
yeah yeah he's already been busted for having the headphones on wrong. he was just taking a pic and not listening. at least I hope he wasn't listening.
 
Apr 10, 2007 at 12:15 AM Post #10 of 562
Quote:

Originally Posted by Asr /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Great review! It would seem that the D5000 shares a bunch of qualities with the AD2000. We'll have to get the AD2000 and D5000 in the same room sometime to find out how they compare.
smily_headphones1.gif



Yeah, I am between the Denon's and the AD2000s. I want to buy one of them within a week. I am very attracted to the comfort of the Denons as well as the looks and Skylab's reports on the bass. However, I will be running my choice headphone unamped sometimes, and it concerns me that Skylab said they're harder to drive than their specs would imply.

Skylab, why is it that a 25ohm headphone is hard to drive by a computer or mp3 player? Are there other factors?

To anyone who has heard both the D5000 and AD2000, which headphone do you think is "better"?
 
Apr 10, 2007 at 12:17 AM Post #11 of 562
Quote:

Originally Posted by spacemanspliff /img/forum/go_quote.gif
yeah yeah he's already been busted for having the headphones on wrong. he was just taking a pic and not listening. at least I hope he wasn't listening.


Yeah, I was just "modeling" them for that pic, and didn't pay attention to what side was what
blink.gif


Quote:

Originally Posted by ionblastoid /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Yeah, I am between the Denon's and the AD2000s. I want to buy one of them within a week. I am very attracted to the comfort of the Denons as well as the looks and Skylab's reports on the bass. However, I will be running my choice headphone unamped sometimes, and it concerns me that Skylab said they're harder to drive than their specs would imply.

Skylab, why is it that a 25ohm headphone is hard to drive by a computer or mp3 player? Are there other factors?

To anyone who has heard both the D5000 and AD2000, which headphone do you think is "better"?



Not sure why this 25 ohm headphone needs so much juice. But it does.
 
Apr 10, 2007 at 12:26 AM Post #12 of 562
Finally, someone gives us what we've all been waiting for.
icon10.gif


Great job.

Question: If the D5000 doesn't seal too well, does it also feel loose on your head? I thought the DT880 was the king of near-zero clamping force (without being loose); any looser and I think it might have been too loose. With the AT wood I'm familiar with, the tighter the seal the more robust the bass. I'm a bit curious how these manage to have the crazy good bass without the seal.
 
Apr 10, 2007 at 1:13 AM Post #14 of 562
Quote:

Originally Posted by Superpredator /img/forum/go_quote.gif
Finally, someone gives us what we've all been waiting for.
icon10.gif


Great job.

Question: If the D5000 doesn't seal too well, does it also feel loose on your head? I thought the DT880 was the king of near-zero clamping force (without being loose); any looser and I think it might have been too loose. With the AT wood I'm familiar with, the tighter the seal the more robust the bass. I'm a bit curious how these manage to have the crazy good bass without the seal.



You'd have to see how the earpads are. Denon has been clever here. They are a tiny but loose, but the way the earpads cradle the ears makes them not move around too much. And the bass is there. Not Darth Beyer bass, but robust bass nonetheless. But versus the Darth Beyer, the Denon allows noticably more outside sound to come in.
 
Apr 10, 2007 at 2:10 AM Post #15 of 562
Nice review Skylab! Keep us posted to any changes you discover.


Also, from reading all of your comments, would it be fair to say the Denon D5000 is much closer to the skybeyers than that darthbeyers? That is what it appears like to me. Might make for an interesting comparison....
biggrin.gif


Cheers!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top