Grabbed from another thread:
if two phones have the same sensitivity, the one with lower impedance is harder to drive.
Say you have a source of 1.4Vrms output, two phones with 16 and 32ohms impedance. @1kHz, Current through the 16ohms one is 1.4/16=87.5mA, and 1.4/32=43.75mA for the 32ohms one. The power draw from the 16ohms one is then P=I^2*Z=0.0875^2*16=122.5mW, and 0.04375^2*32=61.25mW. You can see that the 16ohms phone is actually drawing more current and power from the source.
The reason why we think low impedance phones are easier to drive is that they usually comes with high sensitivity (>100 spl). It's just those low impedance and low sensitivity phones that are particularly hard to drive.
Which might explain why the T5p is so notoriously difficult to drive... Anyway I'm finding the treble better controlled on the iQube than when paired with the RSA Shadow~ No more cringe moments at least thus far...
if two phones have the same sensitivity, the one with lower impedance is harder to drive.
Say you have a source of 1.4Vrms output, two phones with 16 and 32ohms impedance. @1kHz, Current through the 16ohms one is 1.4/16=87.5mA, and 1.4/32=43.75mA for the 32ohms one. The power draw from the 16ohms one is then P=I^2*Z=0.0875^2*16=122.5mW, and 0.04375^2*32=61.25mW. You can see that the 16ohms phone is actually drawing more current and power from the source.
The reason why we think low impedance phones are easier to drive is that they usually comes with high sensitivity (>100 spl). It's just those low impedance and low sensitivity phones that are particularly hard to drive.
Which might explain why the T5p is so notoriously difficult to drive... Anyway I'm finding the treble better controlled on the iQube than when paired with the RSA Shadow~ No more cringe moments at least thus far...