jleewach
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2009
- Posts
- 842
- Likes
- 15
Quote:
The Denon C751's suck, I'm not kidding. They're my all time least favorite "respectable" iem. To me, the mids were almost non-existent, bass was completely bloated, and treble was painfully shrill. I LOVE high-reaching treble when it's done right, but the denons just completely screw it up. It's extended & mediocre quality treble, making for piercing sibilance. To me, the S4's (which many regard as harsh in the upper end) are LESS harsh in treble than the 751s.
**EDIT - Sorry pal, I just noticed you're talking about the 710's, not the 751's. Ignore my rant (unless you're considering the 751's too)
Originally Posted by Gage /img/forum/go_quote.gif Cool, I'm liking the idea of this. However, I read the treble sounds funny, a little bit is OK, but how funny is it? does it sound that unnatural in the upper range, or just a little different? |
The Denon C751's suck, I'm not kidding. They're my all time least favorite "respectable" iem. To me, the mids were almost non-existent, bass was completely bloated, and treble was painfully shrill. I LOVE high-reaching treble when it's done right, but the denons just completely screw it up. It's extended & mediocre quality treble, making for piercing sibilance. To me, the S4's (which many regard as harsh in the upper end) are LESS harsh in treble than the 751s.
**EDIT - Sorry pal, I just noticed you're talking about the 710's, not the 751's. Ignore my rant (unless you're considering the 751's too)
![smily_headphones1.gif](http://www.head-fi.org/forums/images/smilies/smily_headphones1.gif)