Rezound Sound
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2012
- Posts
- 356
- Likes
- 13
Are they better than the file formats that iTunes has? I ask this because I just got an app on my phone and computer where I can convert the songs to FLAC format.
It depends.
MP3 files are compressed, so you may be able to hear some differences (especially with more heavily compressed MP3 files). It depends a lot on the recording, the equipment you have, and most importantly, your hearing.
ALAC is Apple's equivalent to FLAC and is not compressed (lossless).
As for your app, converting from a lossy format (such as MP3) to a lossless one (FLAC/ALAC) will not improve the sound and will simply increase file size with no advantage.
ALAC is Apple's equivalent to FLAC and is not compressed (lossless).
To be anal: ALAC and FLAC are both lossless and compressed. WAV would be an example of an uncompressed and lossless file format.
Even though notice no difference between LAME VBR 256kbs and FLAC, I still get FLAC when possible. Makes me feel better.
Won't get any more quality. Kind of like encoding a 300mb avi file to 10GB mkv isn't going to make it look any better.
What? Care to explain?
You won't get any higher quality by converting a low quality file into a lossless format, as the new file will preserve the exact same audio present on the low quality file, only in a larger file, therefore wasting space for nothing. Conversions from lossless to lossy make some sense for people who use devices that don't support lossless formats, but converting from lossy to lossless is pointless in all regards.
Thats what I understood as well, but not sure what was the context. When we talk about lossless rips, its from cd, not mp3.