Since Tangent is selling the Alps Blue there should be no problem with availability.
Time to tackle some of the issues. Comments are welcome.
You may have noticed that there are two LED modules on the board, one centered and one on the left side of the faceplate. While it is possible we might leave both of them, it would be useful to hear how people feel about positioning the power LED and the headphone jack.
My opinion is the headphone jack should be in the center of the front panel so left and right handed people who use 1 hand to pull their plug out will both be able to do so easily. Putting the LED in the center and the jack on the left means that left handed people will not be able to brace their fingers against the case to withdraw the plug, thus causing the entire unit to shift on the shelf. Some people don't care or use two hands and find the centered LED more asthetically pleasing. I think that since one of the two has to be on the side we might as well make it more ergonomic for everyone.
This leads to the issues of panel mount .vs. board mount components and custom cut panels. The pot is board mounted, that is a done deal. At the moment nothing else is board mounted and there is a 1 inch no parts zone at the front and back of the board to allow for panel mount components. This gives the most flexibility in choosing parts, but means more work during assembly. If we used board mount parts or rigidly specified panel mount components we could then offer custom cut panels.
The so called locking silver tab Neutrik jacks are board mountable but do not in fact lock. The red tab locking jacks do lock but are not board mountable. If we are going for board mountable jacks we might as well go for some of the more sleek and asthetic jacks that don't lock.
Nonlocking jacks can result in shorting the amp outputs. The amp does not have any output protection at the moment. Shorting the outputs for more than a few seconds with the volume at a high level could blow the output buffers. (Imagine yanking the cord 1/2 way out from across the room.) That leaves us with 3 options: live with the risk, use locking jacks, or provide output protection.
I think DC servo circuits like the Gilmore uses are the best thing since sliced bread, but PPL hates them. Other options include fuses, thermal resetting fuses, current regulators, or foldback current limiters, either in the power supply, on the buffer rails, or on the outputs. All of these solutions have the potential to harm the sound quality.
Of all these options, perhaps the least intrusive and complicated is to current limit the power supply and not use too much C1 rail capacitance. The capacitors would still be able to provide power for dynamic passages, but a dead short would quickly drain them and be limited by the maximum current of the supply. Going from 2 to 4 buffers per channel would help distribute load among the buffers, reducing the chance of damage while increasing the ability of the amp to handle dynamic passages, however, doubling the buffers will consume more current and make the amp less portable friendly. PPL's Not So Portable Amp? Perhaps. Maybe all that matters is that it's easy to carry around, not that it will run on rechargable batteries.
Moving to 4 buffers per channel will eat into board space, forcing a reduction in C1, which is OK as there is probably too much C1 capacity anyway.
Alternatively, we could switch to TO-220 package BUF634 buffers, which cost twice as much and don't sound as good but take less space and have built in output protection.
Isn't it interesting how all these issues are interconnected?
We are currently testing the 3 FET isolated opamp power rails configuration to determine how much if any benefit it provides over using a single FET isolated rail for all 3 opamps.