Ableza
Headphoneus Supremus
This is an enthusiast's forum, yes? The amount of negativity towards this new endeavor is incredible to me.
Here's the linkedin for the "keyboard warrior" you claim "knows little to nothing about audio in general":
Would you believe that this ignoramus got paid to write that clueless article?And what's with all those cited statistics, industry analyses and references to interviews with audio engineers? My god, what a newb!
What I'm saying, dear boy, is that you're the tool here.
This is an enthusiast's forum, yes? The amount of negativity towards this new endeavor is incredible to me.
Enthusiasts are often cross bearers that know what's best for everyone.
And what I'm saying in response to that very fulsome and informative reply is that if those qualifications are all legitimate, he has less excuse that the average gadget hack for writing something as feeble-minded as the article linked previously. In other words, if an infinite number of monkeys at an infinite number of typewriters came up with the same article word-for-word, they would be less culpable, having not known what they were doing in between public masturbation and faeces-throwing (the latter two being similar to posting snarky put-downs on Twitter).
So he's an educated weenier. Anybody that says this off hand like it's always a good thing is a bit full of himself. "but you'll be giving the middle finger to artists and record stores everywhere"
It's actually possible that Young actually never liked CD quality and is trying to improve things. I know that's true for myself, I think it might be better to take him at his word than to project a financial motive. The author said Young responded to that question but never related it.
http://neilyoungnews.thrasherswheat.org/2014/03/audiophiles-thinking-and-neil-youngs.html
I don't like the shape and have great access already so it's probably not for me but I don't see why anyone would want to try and kill another choice before it can even be experienced. Self important know it alls. when it exists, see how it works. Then if you don't like it, don't buy it. Who the heck is this author think his protecting with that rhetoric?
Here's another one, mocking RCA and XLR output sockets for being old-fashioned (the Pono has neither) and the actual sockets on the Pono for being old too. The author does not suggest an alternative way of getting sound out of the player. On the other hand, the iPhone is considered "life-altering". He (I'm assuming Chris is a he - okay it almost certainly is a he, isn't it?) then riffs on the "it's only for old guys" schtick and also refers to one part of Ayre's digital circuitry as a "woozle-wuzzle".
I'm guessing someone snipped all the ringpulls off this guy's breakfast. Even more whiney and insecure than the average audio-bashing article... but I'll accept that other opinions are available: https://medium.com/shallow-rewards/710fa81d52fe
Another keyboard warrior passes judgment on Pono, despite not apparently having much of a clue about... well, anything. But specifically not Pono:
http://noisey.vice.com/en_ca/blog/what-pono-is-doing-to-the-music-industry-nothing
I would say the author is pretty much correct. Perhaps the Pono will be a decent player, but so what? Now there are lots of decent players. My Fiio X5 costs less and I have it today, not in October. The Pono store is going to sell remastered flac files - HDTracks filled that niche years ago; as Peggy Lee said: "Is that all there is?'
How many of the expert opinions being offered about Pono are informed by having tested the player and used the files and explored the store? None. Until the final version of the device is actually available and the store is up then they are all just farts in the wind as far as I'm concerned.