- Joined
- Feb 3, 2009
- Posts
- 879
- Likes
- 17
guys, so how about the losseless 16bit/44.1khz and 24bit/96khz or 192khz?
is there significant difference?
is there significant difference?
Originally Posted by charlie0904 /img/forum/go_quote.gif guys, so how about the losseless 16bit/44.1khz and 24bit/96khz or 192khz? is there significant difference? |
Originally Posted by jawang /img/forum/go_quote.gif A popular example would be "float on" by modest mouse, if you listen to an mp3 recording (even if it is 320kbs) you will hear breakup in the singer's voice during the chorus, but it doesn't occur on my cd recording or on my .flac copy |
Originally Posted by Patrick82 /img/forum/go_quote.gif In my system WAV vs FLAC is a bigger difference than FLAC vs 320 mp3 because WAV takes 0% CPU power while both FLAC and mp3 take 1%. My trance music doesn't have much high frequency information, I like to listen to the midrange resolution the most. |