Chexxchexx
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2012
- Posts
- 148
- Likes
- 10
Now that there's a host of truly portable amps capable of driving any over-the-ear headphone (RSA Intruder, ALO Rx MK3-B, Portaphile 627, etc.), please tell me the gain-range arms race is over.
Am I alone in thinking the true market demand for amps of this sort should be limited given that relatively few people will either travel with top-of-the-line over-the-ear headphones or drive them at home via a portable amp?
Particularly given that we're talking about flagship portable amps, it seems that designers would be better served to go one of two ways:
And, while I'm at it, is it too much to ask designers to publish general specs (DAC resolution/sample rate capabilities, for example), offer coherent product line-ups (phase out items that are no longer relevant), and offer a compare feature (which have digital vs. analog volume control, which are balanced vs. single-ended input and/or output, etc.)?
Curious to hear what others have to say. Hopefully this will spark a discussion that will provide some useful direction for designers.
Am I alone in thinking the true market demand for amps of this sort should be limited given that relatively few people will either travel with top-of-the-line over-the-ear headphones or drive them at home via a portable amp?
Particularly given that we're talking about flagship portable amps, it seems that designers would be better served to go one of two ways:
- building the "perfect" DAC/amp combo...like what Michael Goodman's trying to do with the Centrance HiFi M8 (DAC/amp, 24-bit/192kHz support, Apple device compatible, USB compatible, etc.). A smaller chassis would be preferable, but I can deal with the size given all it's trying to offer.
- creating truly superb purpose-built components rather than trying to do everything at the expense of something critical. For example, The Intruder is a DAC/amp that reportedly delivers a perfectly black background for IEMs and can drive all headphones, but the DAC is 16-bit/48kHz...ho-hum, I'll keep my RS-71B. The Rx MK3-B can also drive all headphones, but it doesn't have a DAC and, much more importantly, reportedly has an unacceptable level of hiss with sensitive IEMs...no thanks given that I'll be using the JH13 Pro. The 627 is reportedly great, but sports a pitiful four-hour battery life...enough said. I could go on, but you get the idea.
And, while I'm at it, is it too much to ask designers to publish general specs (DAC resolution/sample rate capabilities, for example), offer coherent product line-ups (phase out items that are no longer relevant), and offer a compare feature (which have digital vs. analog volume control, which are balanced vs. single-ended input and/or output, etc.)?
Curious to hear what others have to say. Hopefully this will spark a discussion that will provide some useful direction for designers.