schneller
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2007
- Posts
- 1,335
- Likes
- 597
Bump for more poll results!
Originally Posted by Confispect /img/forum/go_quote.gif I use no filters more detail it's bright but not fatiguing. But I prefer the grey ones. |
Originally Posted by mvw2 /img/forum/go_quote.gif My theory of the purpose of the gray and black filters... I've had my PFE for a couple weeks and recently grabbed a pair of ER4S earphones. I've been swapping back and forth and playing with the filters. I've also looked at both earphone's frequency response graphs and even overlayed them: Now Etymotic incorporates the midrange peak to offset what our ears do. The end perception (for the common man) should be flat. The PFE mimics the ER4S response closely with the gray filter. I assume PFE was also tested on a KEMAR® manikin. "Target Curve Target curves on Etymotic Research graphs indicate 100% accuracy: The open ear diffuse-field response of the KEMAR® manikin modified to compensate for the high frequency boost added to high-quality recordings. This modification (approximately 5 dB at 10 kHz) is necessary to avoid earphones sounding too bright on commercial recordings. Commercial recordings have a high-frequency boost that compensates for the high frequency roll-off in studio monitor loudspeakers and high-quality stereo loudspeakers and earphones." Because of the way the PFE mimics the same response, I assume the PFE was also developed in a very similar way. The PFE has a little more bass emphasis but otherwise follows the ER4S up to 10kHz. The perceived response should be flat, in theory, using the gray filter. The black filter is a partial cut of that. Maybe it's the best true flat representation or simply an option for folks wanting a stronger bass emphasis. I just thought the similarity between the PFE and ER4S in response was interesting. It shows they both seem to be aiming for the same end goal. |
Originally Posted by mvw2 /img/forum/go_quote.gif My theory of the purpose of the gray and black filters... I've had my PFE for a couple weeks and recently grabbed a pair of ER4S earphones. I've been swapping back and forth and playing with the filters. I've also looked at both earphone's frequency response graphs and even overlayed them: Now Etymotic incorporates the midrange peak to offset what our ears do. The end perception (for the common man) should be flat. The PFE mimics the ER4S response closely with the gray filter. I assume PFE was also tested on a KEMAR® manikin. "Target Curve Target curves on Etymotic Research graphs indicate 100% accuracy: The open ear diffuse-field response of the KEMAR® manikin modified to compensate for the high frequency boost added to high-quality recordings. This modification (approximately 5 dB at 10 kHz) is necessary to avoid earphones sounding too bright on commercial recordings. Commercial recordings have a high-frequency boost that compensates for the high frequency roll-off in studio monitor loudspeakers and high-quality stereo loudspeakers and earphones." Because of the way the PFE mimics the same response, I assume the PFE was also developed in a very similar way. The PFE has a little more bass emphasis but otherwise follows the ER4S up to 10kHz. The perceived response should be flat, in theory, using the gray filter. The black filter is a partial cut of that. Maybe it's the best true flat representation or simply an option for folks wanting a stronger bass emphasis. I just thought the similarity between the PFE and ER4S in response was interesting. It shows they both seem to be aiming for the same end goal. |