Sorry, this is nearly totally off topic, but as a tox person, I HAVE to respond.
MacDef wrote:
"I'm a meat eater; I love beef, chicken, fish, turkey, and even pork occasionally. That said, Kubernetes is 100% correct: you can get 100% of your nutrition from a vegetarian and even a vegan, diet; raising animals for food is incredibly inefficient and wastes an amazing amount of resources each year; and vegetarians who eat a balanced diet are MUCH healthier than non-vegetarians who eat a balanced diet, simply because they have less fat, less sodium, less cholesteral, fewer additives, etc. "
Sorry, most of what you included in this post is simply untrue. Vegetarians are not necessarily healthier than folks who are non-vegetarian. There are a couple largely quoted studies (at least, largely quoted by groups like PETA) that have demonstrated better outcomes from folks that were veg only. But, they compared small numbers of folks who were vegetarians (who also happened to be physically fit, went to the doctor regularly, had high incomes, didn't smoke, etc.) with non-comparable populations (low income, cigarette smoking, two-Quater Pounders large fries and a shake eating couch potatos), and looked at some outcome measures.
Imagine stating that Senn HD 600s are better than ALL other headphones. To prove it, you compared them to a pair of Sony StreetStyles. It's true that the Senns are MUCH better than the streetstyles, but that doesn't prove the argument.
Studies that have been done looking at comparable groups have found:
a.) no differences in outcomes (longevity, illness, etc.) between groups; or
b.) have found that vegetarians, and especially vegans, have GREATER numbers of health problems and died earlier than comparable groups of normal controls.
There are a lot of folks who FEEEEELLL better about not eating meat or curbing fat in their diets or whatever. That doesn't necessarily translate into better health. There are several large studies of cardiac patients that have shown that patients with extremely low fat diets and low cholesterol/lipids have similar rates of death to folks that maintained the high fat diets. They just died of different causes (many more suicides and accidents in the low fat group that resulted in equal numbers of deaths).
BTW: additives aren't necessarily bad for you. Sort of like saying lima beans are bad for you. Lima beans have cyanide in them. In theory, if you ate lima beans, you could die from cyanide poisoning. But, no one could ever possibly be exposed to enough lima beans to get sick. Same thing with the food additives. The doses are so lw that no one has ever developed any toxicity from food additives.
Sorry for the thread drift. Just needed to clarify some common misconceptions.
Bruce