PCB for PCM2902 (digital out)
Mar 29, 2005 at 8:45 PM Post #106 of 147
I got my boards today
smily_headphones1.gif


dac.JPG
 
Apr 9, 2005 at 5:47 PM Post #107 of 147
Quote:

Originally Posted by Magsy
Same here, I would like to build a high end usb dac!
600smile.gif


edit: woops, you say usb>spdif, I'm after usb>analog!



I am prototyping a 2706 circuit with I2S out for use with the P-3A DAC (I2S input). I would rather do a 3200-based board with both I2S and S/PDIF outs as a product though.

BTW - there is a way to isolate I2S from the PC: Differential signalling.

Steve N.
 
Apr 9, 2005 at 6:35 PM Post #108 of 147
Quote:

Originally Posted by audioengr
I am prototyping a 2706 circuit with I2S out for use with the P-3A DAC (I2S input). I would rather do a 3200-based board with both I2S and S/PDIF outs as a product though.


It will be interesting to see what comes of this. I own an AA DDE 3 which also has i2s input.
 
Apr 22, 2005 at 10:30 PM Post #110 of 147
I've made one of these. It's just the simple reference design in the PCM2902 data sheet along with a TOTX179 and TORX179 and their respective suggested operating circuits.

The motivation was to record music from laptop on my Sony MDS-JE520 MD deck bypassing the DAC and noise in the laptop. DIY because, well, I didn't want to spend 350SEK on consumer electronics in a store when I could DIY for around 250SEK. ($50 vs. $35)

Optical transmission because I like optical signalling in general. Plus my desk has lots of signals back and forth and the laptop is a noisy system, so the noise-resistant factors of optical outweigh price of electrical, plus there's the subjective argument that optical feels better. I've read some posts and articles stipulating that optical transmission actually introduces more bit errors in the data stream than electrical signalling but I haven't decided how much I believe that just yet. I guess it comes down to the quality of the components in the system; the attenuation in transmitter, cable and receiver.

At first I planned on only having an optical output but a friend of mine with a synth said he could probably use a digital input soundcard so I put a receiver on it as well.

I had some 15 boards made and have populated one so far. It sort of works. The MD deck unlocks stochastically, causing short glitches in sound, rarely more often than once a minute but sometimes it runs for hours without a glitch. Suggestions on a remedy for this are appreciated. I haven't made any thorough tests since I have other priorities at the moment. I read a post on a japanese board where a TI tech seemed to reply about how one of the DIR S/PDIF receivers had to be externally reset if the sample rate changed, but I don't believe that's what I'm seeing, and I doubt there's a TI TosLink receiver in the Sony deck, and the source applications (xmms/mplayer) don't just switch sampling rates.

Bus powered, all SMD, hand soldered. One bug in the PCB, forgot to ground the TOTX179; that's the red wire.. Just wish the deck wouldn't unlock. Need to investigate further. There's a lot going on in the ALSA USB driver right now as it seems too, my keyboard stops working if I unplug and replug the device because of bugs in the Linux kernel..

Photos: http://cdy.org/~stuge/usnd/
attachment.php



//P
 
May 14, 2005 at 7:05 AM Post #111 of 147
Hi folks,

First time poster here. I found this thread while googling for information on the PCM2902 chip.

This might be out of place in a DIY thread... but a vendor sells just this kind of product - ADS Technologies. They use the 2902e, and the device has USB, RCA in/out and S/PDIF in/out. They call it the Instant Music RDX-150.
Product: http://www.adstech.com/products/RDX-...sp?pid=RDX-150
Froogle: http://froogle.google.com/froogle?q=...b=wf&scoring=p

No relationship, no affiliation, yadda yadda. I never heard of the ADS device until the other day, and saw it tonight when a friend brought one to my house. My curiousity led me googling, and here I am.

Cheers!
 
May 14, 2005 at 7:32 AM Post #112 of 147
There seem to be tons of usb cards with toslink out, but ours has wired output specifically to facilitate putting it inside an existing dac with a minimum of fuss. It is interesting to note that this one uses the 2902, however, How does the analog sound? we opted to not bother since there are better chips for it.

In case you didn't see it, the group buy thread for this is at http://www6.head-fi.org/forums/showthread.php?t=109671 and the project page is at http://www.ecp.cc/usb-spdif.html

-d
 
May 15, 2005 at 3:57 AM Post #113 of 147
Anyone using a Mac with this board? I just finished building mine and after plugging it in the LED lights but nothing else happens. Do I need a driver or USB utility installed or is there probably something wrong with my board?

thanks.
 
May 15, 2005 at 7:40 AM Post #115 of 147
You need to choose the board as your output device in the "sound" pane of your system preferences
smily_headphones1.gif



/U.

EDIT: You can also check if the board is listed as "BB PCM2902" (or something like that) in the information for the USB-bus in your system profiler. If it is, that part of the board is working
smily_headphones1.gif


Quote:

Originally Posted by needlz
Anyone using a Mac with this board? I just finished building mine and after plugging it in the LED lights but nothing else happens. Do I need a driver or USB utility installed or is there probably something wrong with my board?

thanks.



 
May 15, 2005 at 8:56 AM Post #116 of 147
Yep, I confirm!
The PCM2902 and PCM2906 work perfectly with Mac!

X4-black-mac1-sm.jpg


X4-black-mac3-sm.jpg


After connecting it, the new USB device will appear in the list of audio devices. No drivers needed.

And works ok also in linux.
Well.. the latest Mac OS is a sort of linux, AFAIK..

Bye!

EDIT: read an additional note about a Mac problem here:
http://www6.head-fi.org/forums/showp...&postcount=193
 
May 16, 2005 at 12:57 AM Post #118 of 147
Quote:

Originally Posted by dsavitsk
There seem to be tons of usb cards with toslink out, but ours has wired output specifically to facilitate putting it inside an existing dac with a minimum of fuss


Ah, I missed that essential detail. My apologies.
Quote:

. It is interesting to note that this one uses the 2902, however, How does the analog sound?


I haven't wired it up to the receiver just yet. I'll update this thread when I do, however.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top