Stay updated on FiiO at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
[Package for FiiO product] For the following new package, which one you like ?
- Home
- Forums
- Head-Fi Special Forums
- Premier Sponsor Forums and Sponsor Forums
- Premier Sponsor Forums
- FiiO
thatoneheadphonedood
Head-Fier
Tbh, all of them look good but i had to choose 3
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2009
- Posts
- 1,543
- Likes
- 576
I chose 4 but 2, 3, or 4 will do.
John Massaria
Member of the Trade: JM Audio Editions/Headphone Modifications
Number 1 b/c looks like less waste but with same graphic as number 3
I think 2 is obv the best though 4 could be cool with a different look.
I'd bring the angle further down or maybe up, but it's ok.
I'd bring the angle further down or maybe up, but it's ok.
James Shoegazer
500+ Head-Fier
All fun and games until it burns a hole in your wallet
someguyontheinternet
100+ Head-Fier
More than the design I actually like the size of no 1.
There is a lot of waste in unnecessarily large packaging that has always bothered me
There is a lot of waste in unnecessarily large packaging that has always bothered me
All fun and games until it burns a hole in your wallet
So true.
ledzep
Headphoneus Supremus
Basic plain packaging basic marketing and shave 20% off the retail price would suit me better
DAPpower
1000+ Head-Fier
1 looks the most premium, 3 looks ok, but the rest makes the product look kind of cheap and dull.
People are talking about differences in size but I presumed 1 was the same size as 2-4, just turned upright?
I think 3 actually looks the best. I kind of like how the outline is a bit of a tease - you need to open it to see what it's really like! As opposed to the others which have a more complete rendering of the product inside.
Generally I think some of the biggest questions for packaging aren't just how it looks but what the cost and resource usage is of the different options. Especially since there will thousands of them made. I'd generally prefer an option with less environmental impact, so 3 would also get my vote on that front as it looks like it would use less ink than the other options.
I think 3 actually looks the best. I kind of like how the outline is a bit of a tease - you need to open it to see what it's really like! As opposed to the others which have a more complete rendering of the product inside.
Generally I think some of the biggest questions for packaging aren't just how it looks but what the cost and resource usage is of the different options. Especially since there will thousands of them made. I'd generally prefer an option with less environmental impact, so 3 would also get my vote on that front as it looks like it would use less ink than the other options.
spookygonk
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2006
- Posts
- 1,173
- Likes
- 39
All look good, but #4 gets my vote.
asifur
100+ Head-Fier
number 2 seemed clearer more vivid... I'm guessing that's the picture that goes best with the sound performance...
asifur
100+ Head-Fier
most people seem aligned on #2 as well.... I think it just represents the product better... many may disagree tho
ledzep
Headphoneus Supremus
Well seeing as my suggestion of minimum packaging is falling on deaf ears and I'll be opening the wallet once again for the M17 when available and with the wooden box packaging on the M15, I'll expect a solid ivory box embossed with pure 24k gold leaf, lined with white tiger fur and glued with the tears from Greta Thunberg and nothing less !
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
- Home
- Forums
- Head-Fi Special Forums
- Premier Sponsor Forums and Sponsor Forums
- Premier Sponsor Forums
- FiiO