TobaccoRoad
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2009
- Posts
- 690
- Likes
- 28
I think it's safe to say that headphones become well known in this site from review threads started by well known audiophiles, appreciation threads for example. It attracts average listeners like me and we try to read every posts to get much information as possible on that particular IEM. But what I noticed after joining this site was that you'll never be sure until you actually hear it. For example, two people having same favorite genres are likely to have similar preferred sound, at least for the most part. But in my friends' case they disagreed with the sound signature of a certain headphone (Beats by Dre, go figure) as in one loved it and other hated (non-audiophiles like us find this very hard to describe in words). I rarely see this kind of "disagreements" on Head-Fi. Sure there are many posts about which IEM works best for certain types of music, but everyone in here seem to have same opinions when focused on same genres, although in reality that's not the case. I think new people like me tend to think just because those audiophiles love a certain IEM we should too, almost as if we're jumping on a bandwagon.
To give an example, I think Monster Turbine is the most overrated IEM on Head-Fi. I wonder how many people would actually praise Turbines if the appreciation thread was never posted. Amazon ratings aren't even that great. I compared it to Beats and Bose In-Ear and Turbine isn't that much better in terms of SQ, so how come the other two don't get any love? Is it about the Bose name and Dr. Dre endorsements? And for other in-ears that are barely mentioned in this forum (Denon, Audio Technica, etc.), are they just not good enough? I'm also wondering why people give credits to IEMs when they know absolutely nothing about the product. I know many Head-Fi members personally who try to explain Turbine's sound specifically to new members, but none of them actually own this thing.
I don't mean to criticize any members, but I'm wondering if I'm the only one who thought of this.
To give an example, I think Monster Turbine is the most overrated IEM on Head-Fi. I wonder how many people would actually praise Turbines if the appreciation thread was never posted. Amazon ratings aren't even that great. I compared it to Beats and Bose In-Ear and Turbine isn't that much better in terms of SQ, so how come the other two don't get any love? Is it about the Bose name and Dr. Dre endorsements? And for other in-ears that are barely mentioned in this forum (Denon, Audio Technica, etc.), are they just not good enough? I'm also wondering why people give credits to IEMs when they know absolutely nothing about the product. I know many Head-Fi members personally who try to explain Turbine's sound specifically to new members, but none of them actually own this thing.
I don't mean to criticize any members, but I'm wondering if I'm the only one who thought of this.