I want to find a pair of closed back headphones that I can use outside. I currently use the Audeze LCD-2s for when I'm at home. I listen to a lot of blues, blues-rock, rock, easy listening, jazz, classical, etc. Pretty much anything except EDM, rap, and country. I typically lean towards headphones with solid imaging and soundstage, and a good mid-range. Bass and treble should be in check and shouldn't be too powerful or forward. Which of these headphones do you think would better fit my taste? Are there others at a similar price ($400-700) that would be better?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Oppo PM-3 vs Audeze EL-8
- Thread starter JD1993
- Start date
SteveHiFi
Member of the Trade: HiFi Headphones
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2011
- Posts
- 995
- Likes
- 64
I'd go for the PM-3 out of those two, I love the EL-8 but feel that Audeze should address some issues with the design before you get those.
I'm still a fan of the KEF M500 which is an on-ear but quite comfortable -
http://www.hifiheadphones.co.uk/kef-m500-closed-back-foldable-on-ear-headphones-with-mic.html
But you have the luxury of having the PM-3 available now.. go on, treat yourself!
I'm still a fan of the KEF M500 which is an on-ear but quite comfortable -
http://www.hifiheadphones.co.uk/kef-m500-closed-back-foldable-on-ear-headphones-with-mic.html
But you have the luxury of having the PM-3 available now.. go on, treat yourself!
Guppy_
100+ Head-Fier
I'd go for the PM-3 out of those two, I love the EL-8 but feel that Audeze should address some issues with the design before you get those.
I'm still a fan of the KEF M500 which is an on-ear but quite comfortable -
http://www.hifiheadphones.co.uk/kef-m500-closed-back-foldable-on-ear-headphones-with-mic.html
But you have the luxury of having the PM-3 available now.. go on, treat yourself!
Out of curiosity, what design issues?
I've heard that a lot of people have had issues with getting a proper seal on the EL-8s. Also, some models make a weird noise when you press down on the earcup. When I heard the EL-8s, I found the demo model to have that issue as well.
SteveHiFi
Member of the Trade: HiFi Headphones
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2011
- Posts
- 995
- Likes
- 64
Out of curiosity, what design issues?
The cables may fall out of the headphones, and the plastic within the headband part might crack where it gets flexed.
inthere
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2012
- Posts
- 2,588
- Likes
- 1,003
Out of curiosity, what design issues?
The cables are very thin, too long, and short out easily; I'm on my 3rd cable now. Finally, because the cable came out so often and had to be reconnected, now there is a short in the left ear itself and customer service has been extremely slow, responding every 3-5 days.
I'm just concerned that the PM-3s will be too big of a step down from the LCD-2s and that I won't find things to like in it.
Guppy_
100+ Head-Fier
I'm just concerned that the PM-3s will be too big of a step down from the LCD-2s and that I won't find things to like in it.
Interesting... if you do step down, I'd like to know what someone thinks of stepping down (As I stepped up to OPPO PM-3
I didn't mean that in any rude or insulting way. I'm just making the assumption that there will be a jump in quality as one is much more expensive than the other.
Guppy_
100+ Head-Fier
I didn't mean that in any rude or insulting way. I'm just making the assumption that there will be a jump in quality as one is much more expensive than the other.
I was actually being serious!
SteveHiFi
Member of the Trade: HiFi Headphones
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2011
- Posts
- 995
- Likes
- 64
I think that coming down from the LCD line leads some to think of the EL-8 as a little too recessed with the higher frequencies. The LCD-2 is a bit warmer-sounding than the LCD-3/XC types however.
I find the more pricey LCD models a bit forward for my taste, so look on it as not 'better or worse' - just 'better for me' which is the position from which many people make a judgement.
I find the more pricey LCD models a bit forward for my taste, so look on it as not 'better or worse' - just 'better for me' which is the position from which many people make a judgement.
inthere
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2012
- Posts
- 2,588
- Likes
- 1,003
I think that coming down from the LCD line leads some to think of the EL-8 as a little too recessed with the higher frequencies. The LCD-2 is a bit warmer-sounding than the LCD-3/XC types however.
I find the more pricey LCD models a bit forward for my taste, so look on it as not 'better or worse' - just 'better for me' which is the position from which many people make a judgement.
You're talking about the EL-8 open right? Because I find the highs on the EL-8 closed screeching.
*edit* Customer service seems to have completely disappeared now, haven't heard from them in over a week.
SteveHiFi
Member of the Trade: HiFi Headphones
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2011
- Posts
- 995
- Likes
- 64
I suppose I could be referring to both - I was playing with both versions at the same time but liked them both. No screeching highs for me, not that I noticed. Not that you're wrong of course. I've heard others don't like them too.
My main concern is that the EL-8s just lack bass to my ears, especially compared to the LCD-2s.
I found the closed EL-8's to be unlistenable. The open are okay but nowhere near $700 worth of sound. I know this is a subjective hobby and we all hear differently, but I'm not the only person to say this.
The PM-3 is going to be a slight step down from the LCD-2, for sure. It'll also be a more neutral (less warm) sound signature. I think that will be what you notice more than anything. The PM-3 is still a very good headphone. I use a HE-560 as my main headphone at home (I sidegraded from the LCD-2 because I wanted a brighter sound signature) and a PM-3 for my work/portable headphone and I'm completely satisfied with it.
As I said, I think your biggest issue will be the slightly different sound signature. If you can live with it, it's a great headphone, especially for the price.
I can think of some other closed options you'd like but they're not "portable".
The PM-3 is going to be a slight step down from the LCD-2, for sure. It'll also be a more neutral (less warm) sound signature. I think that will be what you notice more than anything. The PM-3 is still a very good headphone. I use a HE-560 as my main headphone at home (I sidegraded from the LCD-2 because I wanted a brighter sound signature) and a PM-3 for my work/portable headphone and I'm completely satisfied with it.
As I said, I think your biggest issue will be the slightly different sound signature. If you can live with it, it's a great headphone, especially for the price.
I can think of some other closed options you'd like but they're not "portable".
Users who are viewing this thread
Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)