matthewhypolite
500+ Head-Fier
I too find Tyll's reviews interesting but all over the lot...i did take his advice regarding the Moon 430 amp which I love but his changing his tune about headphones he raved about a couple of months ago gets a bit old quickly......
From my perspective it doesnt seem like he changes his tune. The HEK was knocked off the wall wall but his description of the HEK now doesn't appear different to me than when he originally reviewed it. His and Jude's opinion on the new focals seem to align also.
In any event, reviews on headphones, like reviews for most things, is subjective regardless of how you look at it, even user's opinions on this very forum is also subjective. The abyss for e.g. gets huge praise by headfiers on the abyss forums, but was disliked by Tyll and reasons stated why he dislike them. Some of them i can agree with, being an Abyss owner. But despite the flaws i still love the cans.
The key thing i take away from reviews is, how they align with my personal preference and what im looking for. So if to me, bass is the most important thing, and im ok with "good/average" midrange, and an experience reviewer says, X cans has great bass but lacks midrange, then i know how to apply that review towards my decision/purchase. Tyll says the HEK still has the warm lush laid back tonality, and this is the reason he puts the more dynamic focals ahead of it? I agree with that statement. Because i have both the HEK and Abyss, and the reason i keep both cans, is because the Abyss destroys the HEK in terms of dynamism and visceral impact. So when i read his Focal reviews, what i apply to my own decision is. HEK = more/better bass, but Focal = Better overall across the spectrum. If he said something like HEK bass sucks, then id be concerned.
Focals seem to be getting rave reviews across the board, Jude, Tyll, Other headfiers, cnet, etc. I'm actually considering a pair, would be great if i get some ears on though.