bcowen
Headphoneus Supremus
Nice! And that's a sweet looking wartime VT-229 front and center. What's the tube behind it?My weekend with Odyssey + He6se V2. Love this combination.
Nice! And that's a sweet looking wartime VT-229 front and center. What's the tube behind it?My weekend with Odyssey + He6se V2. Love this combination.
I don't think you really want to know that .What's the tube behind it?
I bet even @UntilThen doesn't know without going to look at it.I don't think you really want to know that .
I guess it is a GEctifier.Hmm, a rectifier?
Then it would be called a wreckedifier.I guess it is a GEctifier.
Nice! And that's a sweet looking wartime VT-229 front and center. What's the tube behind it?
Do you like it (the Sylvania)?That VT-229 is your recommendation and the tube behind is a Mullard gz34.
Octa, just got around to reading your casual impressions - from 7 months ago no less, look at how busy I am! And starting tomorrow working 7 days a week.When I received Eternity people asked to come back after some time and tell them what I think about it.
So I wrote a few words about it and, overall, about my experience with UltraSonic Studios.
It is not a review, more the story of my purchase and how I see it after around 3 weeks of use.
If someone is interested, the file is attached.
PS. Don't take it too seriously, I have a strange kind of humour, some might not appreciate.
That makes me a zealot: 5 & 12…I believe in 3 tube amps and 5 headphones.
That makes me a zealot: 5 & 12…
You had a lot of interesting points in there and things I agree on like a fairly flat sound preference with a slight nod to warmth, and I also often like a liquid like sound. For the limited time I got to try an Ultrasonic amp before I also had an odd experience of adjusting to a different type of presentation. By definition superior with elements such as instrument separation and sense of 'air', but an A/B to your old equipment can make you have a preference for the former in some way; it takes time for brain burn-in to realize the newer one really is better.
So KT77 are your favorite powers here? You only tried GEC, right? I remember many / all who tried this tube class on Feliks Audio amps held it as a favorite as well. But what about larger successors like KT120, 150 or the others mentioned recently by UT... EL158 or the monster KT170's any plans to try those? Of course YMMV using different amps.
Yes, for me GEC KT77 were the best on Eternity but they were sounding very different from what I heard on Elise when I tried them. Elise being a warm and less detailed amplifier, was not a good pair for these. At that time I tried the GEC KT77 and russian Gold Lions KT77 and neither were in my preferences. Here they are different, and I started to listen to KT77 or EL34 constantly. But I have to mention here that my impressions are biased by the type of sound I am looking for. For rock EL34 is the king and KT77 is a kind of premium EL34 for me. For classical I would go for KT88 and for soft acoustic music for KT66. So what to say, there is no general answer. Everyone has to search for its own sound signature. The good part is that the amplifier is flexible enough to let you find it.Octa, just got around to reading your casual impressions - from 7 months ago no less, look at how busy I am! And starting tomorrow working 7 days a week.
So KT77 are your favorite powers here? You only tried GEC, right? I remember many / all who tried this tube class on Feliks Audio amps held it as a favorite as well. But what about larger successors like KT120, 150 or the others mentioned recently by UT... EL158 or the monster KT170's any plans to try those? Of course YMMV using different amps.