jagorev
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- May 16, 2005
- Posts
- 3,316
- Likes
- 15
PX100 sounds better (more balance and accuracy), but the KSC-75 (or the KSC-55 version) is more usable for jogging.
the ksc75 is a good set of phones considering the price...but if you got good ears you will hear flaws in the sound for exampe what bugs me the most is the cricket sound they give when deep bass comes out ... |
Originally Posted by tomb On a different note - I've come to the conclusion that descriptions like "true," "accurate," "neutral," "precise," etc., means: expensive phones, no bass. |
Originally Posted by PrototypeX2 I heard that PMX 100 had an awful fit. |
Originally Posted by jagorev Due to their tighter fit, PX100 has more bass than the KSC75. If we were discussing the Portapro, that would be a different matter....but the clip-on style Koss is really not all that bassy. |
Originally Posted by Peyotero You guys truly belive that the bass got so much to do with the fit huh? The headbend would have to literaly squize your ears to make such a difference. Now, i can tell the difference between the PP's with and without the reversed 414 pads mod but when the drivers both on the ksc75 and the px100 just lay on your ears, the amount of bass got more to do with the driver and membrane design then with the fit. IMHO ^^ |