kh600rr
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2014
- Posts
- 996
- Likes
- 56
This has gotten to the point of absurd now.
Oh please. Give me a break with the hand wringing. Measurements may not provide any insight for you but you certainly do not speak for me.
If one can predict the form of a graph from listening and vice versa, that implies correlation between sound and graphs. Many of us do this often. Correlation in this regard implies knowledge. We are learning how a graph relates to sound. Are you saying there is no correlation between graphs and sound?
Choosing a compensation standard is a problem and a fair point you make. What is your view on uncompensated graphs?
When you try to make neutral iems, like the N4 and PR, which neutral standard do you adhere to? If you do use a standard, how do you know you've matched it?
I'm not saying that whatever standard you choose is the right one, or that there is such a thing as a correct standard, only that your being forthcoming about your process and rationale would be appreciated by some folks here. This information, your reference target and graphs of how your products hit that target, is what we mean by knowledge in this instance. Without that knowledge, and without a money-back guarantee (not sure if you offer this), it becomes very difficult to rationalize an expensive purchase.
I'm only trying to clearly present the views of a growing base of audiophiles on this site, and hopefully gain a little insight into the perspective of an iem designer.
Stay updated on Noble Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
Oh please. Give me a break with the hand wringing. Measurements may not provide any insight for you but you certainly do not speak for me.
I didn't say I spoke for you. But the bottom line is, graphs are not regulated, I certainly wouldn't place my "hard earned" money down based on a graph that has no regulation or based on "specifiactions" that have no apparent regulation as well.
FC, how do you know if your tunes are neutral? Is it by ear? Can you tell us how you tune your CIEMs?
Stay updated on Noble Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
I've already gone over the design process.
We should just change the name of this thread to, " Full Circle I question your integrity, and you have no idea what your doing thread" IMO.
Stay updated on Noble Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
You guys are batman and robin. I see you two together all the time.
Stay updated on Noble Audio at their sponsor profile on Head-Fi.
|
We should just change the name of this thread to, " Full Circle I question your integrity, and you have no idea what your doing thread" IMO.
To be honest, I was rather unimpressed with the Roxanne. However I only tried the universal set. The sound is rather muddy. The JH 13 is better but then in someway too open, just lacking body.
I'm now looking forward to test the K10, I will be very disappointed if it's less impressive than my SE846.
When comparing the JH options (JH 13, JH 16, JH Roxanne) with the Shure SE846 I would stick to the Shures for sure.
Hopefully FC tunes his CIEMs. I would like to see the tunes, and if he doesn't disclose them and assures us his company's CIEMs are neutral, maybe some of would take his word for it. If I get a chance I will try them out, but until then, I'm not dropping my hard earned cash based on his word. Graph will help a bit. Please show off that neutrality you speak of.
I won't belabor the point after this post and I have no intentions of trying to change your mind but no one is talking about believing some unknown graph that just pops up in a thread. Or maybe they are but I'm not. Headroom, Innerfidelity, Purrin, Rin Choi and Golden Ears are all established and verifiable entities that perform measurements. Many have gone to great lengths to explain their setups, methods and compensation philosophies, in order to be as transparent as possible. Once you have heard any of the myriad of iems they've measured, you can establish a correlating baseline with your own subjective impressions.
Regulation is a terrible idea IMO. The last thing anyone needs is government oversight of iems and headphones. Now industry standards would be great! But that can be done without government intervention. The science of this is still growing and evolving. The guys at Harman are doing a lot of great research that may one day alter the way measurements and compensation methods are applied. We live in great times. So many opportunities to educate oneself and learn more about the hobby we love so much.
Cheers.