Quote:
Originally Posted by amphead /img/forum/go_quote.gif
There are probably a few builders, who currently have built the Millett Hybrid and the Millett Max. What are the similarities in sound and what are the differences? Is there a night and day difference in the sound? Thoughts?
|
Well, I built 4 Milletts - used single BUF's, double-stacked BUF's, the OPA551 and finally - the Intersil HA-5002, stacked and unstacked. Then I proceeded to add Diamond Buffers to each: one with the 2S3422/2SA1359, one with the 2SC3421/2SA1358, one with the MJE 243/253, and one with the BD135/136. All were powered by upgraded Treads.
The sound signature is identical to the MAX except the MAX has an unbelievable reserve of power. The Millett, even with highly detailed Diamond Buffers, did not have the authority needed to maintain the very deep and strong bass of the MAX. The Millett also seemed to choke a bit on higher impedance cans, while the MAX seems to push through every last bit of detail to the phones.
Keep in mind that there are those who said the Millett Hybrid with DB's performs better than a Melos, is better than almost all the familiar Asian tube amps, and when equipped with Black Gates was up there with an M3. So, take the slightly negative comments compared to the MAX in perspective, please.
None of that should be viewed as a criticism of the older Millett Hybrid - either Pete's or Drew's and Nate's version. Colin Toole's MAX is the next stage of refinement - one should expect that it is an improvement in many respects.
EDIT: Given a choice of amps, I would always want to have a Millett of some sort - Hybrid or MAX.