-1dB, -3dB, -5dB, ...
and, then tells them all about the complete sound?
Does this automatically as an example, that a pair of headphones at a position around the 20Hz has a little more dB, completely better?
There are people who can not understand. They discuss technically till death.
Would they give up a K1000 because a Audeze has dB more bass?
What do they know when they have 25 sheets and measurement diagrams on?
What exactly do they do then the overall sound?
Aha - just-2dB at 25Hz. Aha, this curve at 3kHz.
Aha, and then tell them something about the overall sound?
I give them 20 measuring diagrams and they tell me then, without listening to exceptional values which belongs to which headphones.
This works for things that are really bad.
But that certainly does not top headphones that are all okay so far.
Or they think: you have a measurement diagram of Orpheus, from the Stax Lambda X, from Audez'e LCD3 from HiFiMAN HE6, -
they do not know is which graph belongs to which headphones
and then they tell me without hearing before: That's exactly my favorite pair of headphones?
That I would like to see.
And I'd like to see if the choir has more breathing or not. I would like to see reference to a measurement diagram.
No kidding: Let's put us together, I give them five diagrams and they tell me then: Here there is more breathing. There, the ratio was exactly between wealth and transparency.
And much more.
All of this has to do with quality at the end. Take the measuring diagrams and bury them.
You can derive some important things - that's correct. But they can not derive a lot of things. For this they need to hear.
Anecdotes are what they are, for others the tool.
Example: Computer says: ideal measurements
and they know that it fits