New iPods is coming
Sep 2, 2008 at 8:43 PM Post #16 of 206
Quote:

Originally Posted by ameyer17 /img/forum/go_quote.gif
I'd think 32 GB of flash would be more likely right now.


To stay ahead of the game (like they always do) it should be popped to 64gb. FM tuner - dead issue as Apple will never implement it. And for the CUSTOM EQ - I'd like that myself (along w/the 64gb).
 
Sep 2, 2008 at 9:48 PM Post #18 of 206
Quote:

Originally Posted by fumashirou /img/forum/go_quote.gif
longer battery life~~~~


LOL - shootin' for the 2week mark I guess?
 
Sep 2, 2008 at 10:27 PM Post #21 of 206
Photoshop for Ipod! Lower price! Complete metal case.
rolleyes.gif
 
Sep 2, 2008 at 10:50 PM Post #23 of 206
Quote:

Originally Posted by centerfold /img/forum/go_quote.gif
- The ability to make breakfast


Haha!

Why stop there?


Any way i think the nano will be touch screen.

The classic will be a 6.5g upgrade with battery life and capacity bumped.

We will see a competitor to archos's new IMF's.
 
Sep 2, 2008 at 11:18 PM Post #24 of 206
I really hope the new Nano's are nothing like the "mocks". Ugly imo and not so nano but then again I was amongst many who did not like the "fatty" but that turned out quite fine in person
Quote:

Originally Posted by major_works /img/forum/go_quote.gif
And for this you're willing to pay... how much?


I agree 32gb flash is more likely... but to answer your question

£200-250
beerchug.gif
Yes I am one of those who wants the world, who wants it all and wants it now but does not want to pay for it
biggrin.gif
*hides*
 
Sep 3, 2008 at 12:53 AM Post #25 of 206
- smaller size (bigger screen but smaller buttons)

- 32gb flash

- awesome headphone out

- non i-tunes software needed? (LOLOLOL)
 
Sep 3, 2008 at 2:24 AM Post #28 of 206
I have a feeling that we may not get much change on ipod classic other than a possible storage bump or updated interface. I suspect the big change will be on nano which reportedly will have longer body(just like before), a bigger screen and a possible storage bump as well.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top