pasgod
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2010
- Posts
- 114
- Likes
- 11
With the Audio GD, you will not have the same sound signature as with the Cambridge. I give you a link of a review of the NFB 2 with wolfson where the reviewer compared it with the dac magic. For him, it is night and day. NFB 2 is his new reference.
http://www.digitalaudioreview.net.au
And don't forget NFB 2 is the little dac, not balanced.
You can read review about Linn Klimax DS. It is as costly as a car, for a lot of reviewers it is a reference, i hope it does not sound like dac magic. Implementation is very important, power supply, output stage are fundamental. It is not because two products use the same chip, that they have the same sound signature. And we already told you, it is not the same chip in the Cambridge.
http://www.digitalaudioreview.net.au
And don't forget NFB 2 is the little dac, not balanced.
You can read review about Linn Klimax DS. It is as costly as a car, for a lot of reviewers it is a reference, i hope it does not sound like dac magic. Implementation is very important, power supply, output stage are fundamental. It is not because two products use the same chip, that they have the same sound signature. And we already told you, it is not the same chip in the Cambridge.