Loevhagen
1000+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2011
- Posts
- 1,316
- Likes
- 84
Agree to some parts of your post; LCD-3 and design. I foresee that the "LCD-4" (claimed said to be released in due time / planned already) will indeed have a different design.
I have just read through the last 6 pages and the only thing that came out of the last 6 pages is not to buy a used LCD-2, because of poor quality control with Audeze and folks keep buying the LCD-2 in hopes of getting a good pair and selling the not so good pairs. Or like the HE6's pairing them up with a high powered amp and blowing up the headphone, like Ray did with his DS amp and HE6, or so he claims.
And maybe Audeze needs to charge $1945. per pair of LCD-3 because they have to scrap at-least 1 out of 3 pairs to come up with a good pair. But still that is cheaper than having to buy 2,3,4 pairs of LCD-2's to get a good pair.
Please don't think I am complaining, this is just my take on the last 6 pages of this thread.
Forums should be on the list for those studying group thinking.
Suddenly the LCD-2s have massive variations in sound signature - and that variation span from "bad" to "good". What?! Its kind of funny, and in my mind not throstworthy compared to all the postings done on the LCD-2 the last year omitting such "easy to hear" variations.
A lot of effort was made by many members here on elaborating on rev. 1 versus rev. 2, and not variation within each batch.
Hey. Maybe it is the amount of oil applied on the wood that causes "all these massive variations in sound". Or, just group thinking and flavour topic of the week.
Good point, and if we look at the Beyerdynamic 7xx, 8xx, 9xx, 7x and T1 -> They are all quite similar in design, aren't they.
Yes or look at hifiman or grado even, their headphones models might be slightly different but use pretty much always the same materials and manufacturing techniques.
Out of curiosity I checked Sennheiser key fact, they have +2'100 employees and made 436mio$ of turnover in 2010, I expect Audeze to be around 1% of that and that's being generous, so do the math
That's because people are not complaining about their ergonomics (of Beyer, Hifiman, Grado etc) while that has been a complaint of the LCD-2 (and LCD-3).
That's because people are not complaining about their ergonomics (of Beyer, Hifiman, Grado etc) while that has been a complaint of the LCD-2 (and LCD-3).
I've seen quite a few complaints (including mine) regarding the ergonomics of the Grados.
Truly the World's Least Comfortable.
Okay, that's maybe a bit too harsh, but they are not very comfy headphones.
yeah , the Grado and bayerdynamic headphones have similer design
But, if i were to put Grado RS1i 's driver in RS2i casing , will uit sound the same as RS1i ...my guess is, no. ( i took 2 of the closest models )
again if i put bayer T1's driver and place it in dt880 , will it work as good as t1. again no.
not with the case with LCD2 and 3 , if i were to put the new driver in LCD2 and replace the pads with new ones it will be the SAME. this is what i was trying to say.
note that my comments are based completely on what i have read here, there has been no indication that apart from, the wood, pads, cable entry and driver there isn't a difference between the LCD2 and LCD3.
looks wise similarities, i dont mind that ( infact the styling is a part the feel that the brand has)
That's because people are not complaining about their ergonomics (of Beyer, Hifiman, Grado etc) while that has been a complaint of the LCD-2 (and LCD-3).