Quote:
He's not talking about your impressions, he's talking about meet impressions in general, which aren't as reliable because of the noise, time constraints, gear variables, music variables, cool head-fiers distracting you, sexy JH girls distracting you, and whatever beverages may or may not be coloring your judgement...
IME the LCD-2 is one of the worst meet performers because of the open back and their no-treble-peak signature which doesn't hold up to background noise as well as brighter headphones. At least that was my feeling trying to listen to mine at a meet.
Yes this is pretty much what I meant.
Quote:
He said to wait for legitimate impressions. What other kind of impressions are there? I would not trust someone listening at home for 5-20 minutes more than someone listening at a show for the same duration. A full review is quite a different animal and is more reliable.
We'll have to agree to disagree then. I wasn't saying that your impressions are inferior to others' impressions, I was talking about the situation. If I said "don't listen to Max, you guys should read Jude's impressions instead" then I could see you getting offended and for a perfectly legitimate reason. My comment was more a reminder that meet impressions (especially those at a speaker show in a large room) are about the least reliable impressions there are. Just look at some of the impressions in this thread; some said there was hardly any difference between the LCD2/3 and then others are saying the LCD3 is the best thing in the world.
I certainly don't agree that x amount of time at home carries the same validity as x amount of time at RMAF. I don't know about you, but my listening space at home doesn't sound like a tradeshow and my open back headphones let outside noise in. I also personally find listening critically to a bunch of setups at meets a bit fatiguing. If you're interested, my own ranking of impression validity is something like this:
Impressions by somebody who has owned the HP for a while
had the HP for a short amount of time (loaner or just got it)
in home audition
small meet or get together (like the NJ/NY/Norcal/Socal guys do)
local meet with multiple rooms
RMAF/CJ/meet with one large room
I also agree with purrin that it is important to note whose ears you trust. Some things I look for:
Have I agreed with a lot of this person's posts?
Do we share similar tastes in music?
How experienced is this person?
Do they have technical or professional knowledge?
Is there a reason for them to be biased?
Very important to me but apparently few agree: Does the person review negatively? To me the worst are people who review tons of gear and yet it all 'sounds great for the money', 'is the best I've ever heard', etc.