Nervana: Neurotransmitter stimulating IEM's?

Mar 4, 2016 at 10:38 AM Post #16 of 38
  Very true. I guess it's not introducing new dopamine molecules, just stimulating the release. The only was I guess I could see it being damaging would be in combination with any neurotoxic substance.
 
Interesting with what you say about the meditation too. Could make it a more powerful experience.


Well especially for anchoring visualization or release guided meditations. I have a lot of work to do on old psychological/emotional programing that I'm trying to lose and new programming that I'm trying to anchor, and I think that a dopamine shot will help my brain rewire.
 
Mar 4, 2016 at 11:16 AM Post #17 of 38
  Your comment before deleting it was fine!
 
I wonder to what degree would dopamine be released past a placebo level and or normal pleasures.

I'm terrible and writing on my phone, especially when I'm rushed off my feet, but thanks!
 
This really is it, isn't it - I mean, where is the proof that this method of electro-stimulation actually has a medically significant affect on dopamine levels? I was unable to see any links to research on the website, which alone should raise red flags sky high. I was searching on my phone, so I may have missed something.
 
Mar 5, 2016 at 4:00 PM Post #20 of 38
I'm terrible and writing on my phone, especially when I'm rushed off my feet, but thanks!

This really is it, isn't it - I mean, where is the proof that this method of electro-stimulation actually has a medically significant affect on dopamine levels? I was unable to see any links to research on the website, which alone should raise red flags sky high. I was searching on my phone, so I may have missed something.


I think it's fair to be skeptical, but I'm intrigued and would like to try them. I'd think it would be pretty expensive for the company to pay for a medical study that might not persuade skeptics anyways
 
Mar 6, 2016 at 2:00 AM Post #21 of 38
I think it's fair to be skeptical, but I'm intrigued and would like to try them. I'd think it would be pretty expensive for the company to pay for a medical study that might not persuade skeptics anyways

I just got the pre-order date notice. March 15 on Indiegogo. I'm in, hoping to get a big discount!
 
Mar 12, 2016 at 12:43 AM Post #25 of 38
Obviously. I'm confident this will come out in the wash with at least a majority opinion. Given the skepticism already and critical types that are likely to write first reviews, could actually be a nocebo effect.


There are preview articles from writers who tried them at CES.
 
Mar 12, 2016 at 7:14 AM Post #26 of 38
  Yeah I feel these would operate more on the placebo effect rather than not. That being said, placebo isn't always a bad thing.

 
 
You're right, the placebo effect really is a wonderful thing at times, I'd just rather not pay for it!  
 
Obviously. I'm confident this will come out in the wash with at least a majority opinion. Given the skepticism already and critical types that are likely to write first reviews, could actually be a nocebo effect.

 
A fair one, expectation does often have a profound affect. Expecting physical proof of something working isn't much of an ask though, is it? Especially when the claims are quite bold.
 
Mar 12, 2016 at 11:49 AM Post #27 of 38
You're right, the placebo effect really is a wonderful thing at times, I'd just rather not pay for it!  


A fair one, expectation does often have a profound affect. Expecting physical proof of something working isn't much of an ask though, is it? Especially when the claims are quite bold.

If it's based on prior tech, those studies outside this specific application may apply. They're launching pre-orders from Indiegogo, so I doubt that they're flush with cash.

There are first impressions from CES.
 
Mar 16, 2016 at 9:39 AM Post #28 of 38
Preorders went up yesterday. I should get my unit in June.
 
Mar 23, 2016 at 9:13 AM Post #30 of 38

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top