- Joined
- Dec 31, 2013
- Posts
- 108
- Likes
- 52
It's too bad, because (IMO) they looked much better with the larger rounder pads and they certainly felt better on the head.
I don't think any pad mod can make those "look good".
It's too bad, because (IMO) they looked much better with the larger rounder pads and they certainly felt better on the head.
+1Try the K545 first Unless you prefer a warmer signature and less soundstage.
Try the K545 first Unless you prefer a warmer signature and less soundstage.
I needed a closed headphone for airplane travel. I bought both the Bose QC3 and the NADHP50. The Bose isolates better and actually sounds pretty good, but has a bass that is a little too much and not the tightest. The NAD has much better bass and better highs so I am going to keep these. The Isolation is very good not like Bose, but I think good enough. I will just turn the vol. up a little more to compensate. I think these NAD's sound better than my Ultrasone Sig. Pros. By the way my source is the HIFIMAN 901.
I highly disagree. Sig Pros have so much more details in the sound than the NAD HP50.
Sig Pro's measures considerable worse than the HP50 despite costing far more. I believe the HP50 sounds cleaner with better accuracy despite costing less.
Can anyone make a comparison between the HP50 and any of these 3 headphones, just in terms of sound quality... Shure SRH940, Audio Technica ATH-ESW9 or the AKG K550?
I'm trying to choose a closed-back model mainly for at-home listening, and I want to keep to a budget of $300AUS if possible. My at-home listening set-up currently is HE-500, Audio-GD SA-31SE, M2Tech Hiface and lap-top. On the whole, I'm quite content with this rig, it's just that I have a tendency to get tempted to turn the volume up evidently a little too loud at times. I've had tinnitus permanently since I first got a bit carried away when testing how a DT990 sound when you actually turn them up loud enough to enjoy the midrange (about a year or so ago), and this seems to be my major issue with open back headphones... the bar has been lifted in terms of the level of detail and instrument separation that I crave now, but even though I don't think I ever turn them up stupidly loud these days, I'm often torn between being careful not to risk exacerbating my tinnitus and having the music at a level where you feel immersed in the music in the same way as listening to a good stereo system. So my next headphone purchase will be of the sealed cup variety.
I have auditioned and was impressed with the SRH940 and the ATH-ESW9. Decided against picking up the Shures because I wanted a bit more weight in the bass and couldn't go for the Audio-Technica's because I thought durability wasn't good enough for a portable phone. I mentioned the K550 because I think it could be another viable option in the price range.
I would describe myself as a bass-head but I demand a good level of detail and a fully 'rounded' sound. If I can't have a basshead can that is also a genuine audiophile performer within this budget, then I'll settle for a more neutral headphone - as long as it does have punch to the bass and can do sub-bass. Definitely wouldn't be happy with something on the bass-light side of neutral. The opinions on the bass of the HP50 seem to vary quite a bit from what I've read. Obviously there's little doubt that they offer good value for money.
I also own IE80s (which I love) and QuietComfort 2. Thanks a lot (in advance) for any opinions/comparisons.
I might use the cans outside the house from time to time but portability isn't a priority at all.