Since last week I have the possibility to test the Mytek Stereo192-DSD
For comparison i have my beloved Apogge Mini-Dac.This unit outperformed some other CD-Players and dacs in the past...
Both devices are connected via Balanced XLR outputs, cables are all the same sort / balanced Studio XLR cables
The source is a Mac with iTunes and Pure Music upsampling OFF
The data files are PCM 44.1-96kHz 16 / 24bits
First I tested the best connectivity for each device.
The Mytek Stereo192-DSD clearly benefits from the FW connection.
Upsampling off, PCM Filter sharp,analog vol.control
The Apogee Mini-Dac also has FW, but it sounds clearly better with a separate USB 2 HifaceTwo over Coax S / PDIF Interface.
Mytek is also very good via the Hiface2 > S/PDIF coax.
My Macs Toslink sounds crap , has high jitter. Only advantage is the electrical isolation.
The Hiface2 has built in Pulse-Transformer. so i believe it it also isolated.(Transformer-Isolated)
No 'noise' or 'buzzing' or 'hum' audible via the HifaceTwo.
The headphone outputs of the devices are slightly different.
With my Shure SE535 (36Ohms/119dB sensitivity) only the output of the Apogee is absolutely noise-free
With low impedance HP the Apogee has most impact. Even my older LCD-2 sounds very controlled. Also my K701
HPs like T1, Sennh.600/650 are slightly better connected to the Mytek amplifiers.
Over XLR analog outputs both converters give a very clean and powerful sound image.
The Apogee Mini-Dac has even the most power reserves through its anaolog XLR outputs.
Apogee and Stereo192Dac can also be controlled internally.
The Mini-Dac via channel-separated Potis, the Mytek by jumper.
Mini-Dac and Stereo192-DSD / Stereo 96-Dac also have the option to control the analog output via front knob.
Both units uses analog attenuation. ( i do not try the Mytek's digital volume control ) someone here prefer the digital volume ?
i first noticed ,the Mytek sound is very clean in the heights. Sometimes I have the feeling that they are a bit artificial in the upper range.
Do the heights have more resolution over the Apogee ? Hmm , difficult ! The apogee's heights are same intensity but less artificial.
Is it a kind of
sizzling or so ? Perhaps aliasing ? ( as i said ,i do not use any Upsampling or special filter setting on the Mytek)
It is like using an exciter to enhance the upper range. Or if someone adds minimal Tube-or Tape-harmonics to the signal.
Apogee Mini-Dac has the same treeble energy, but less 'smooth&widening' or softening/enhancing the signal.
It sounds more natural with Mini-dac.
The heights of both units are free of ear-fatigue even at very high levels !
If i listen to vocals ( mostly Vocals in Pop/Wave/ 80-90s music

lol ) both units are great performer.
Voices sound absolutely genuine and are placed in the right space. With the Mytek there is a bit more space arround the voices.
The Mini-Dac voices sound a bit more in front of you. For me an advantage for live-music or acustic instruments.
The Mytek has slightly deeper bassresponse, only a bit more punch at the lowest end.That's pretty cool with some electronic music !
Apogee Mini-Dac does more 'kicking'. Drums sounds powerfull ,more forward, more present. More live-character i think and more in your face. The sound-centre (mono-mid) has more pressure.
Mytek's advantage is the remote control via Apple remote. Pretty cool feature !
So wich unit do i prefer ?
I think both dacs are great , the Mytek now is my dac for electronic music) and the mini-dac is the pop-music and livemusic performer
