chris_ah1
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2006
- Posts
- 779
- Likes
- 10
Ok, it seems that perhaps I came off a bit too harsh in my post in the VS5 go vibe thread. However, I still stand by what i said - it was a shame that there was no hinting at the new product......Anyhow, a few days ago I got my GV5 low gain and my feelings are unfortunately mixed. I wanted to love it, but umm...well this is what i posted:
"I received my low gain version of the original from norm yesterday and I have to admit, I was a bit suprised with it.
After everything people have said, I can't see how the 6172 sounds synthetic. If anything it sounds murkier than using the audio straight from my M3. If anything it sounds how i expected a 2227 might sound like.
Admittedly the amp has cut down all electrical noise (except when the HD spins for a time, but in a portable environment you don't notice). Also, the hiss disappears unless I turn the volume way up, all I'm left with is the hiss on the recording - nothing you can do about that.
However, I'm wondering if the differences I'm hearing are from the line out rather than the amp?
I was just extremely surprised at how less open the sound was than my iaudio M3. I believe within the first ten seconds I realised what a difference no crossfeed makes i guess...Any ideas?
e.g. on a recording of handel messiah ('tis the season) it felt as if I was back in the cathedral singing it with the echo the amp introduced, but in other situations it is less rewarding. Almost like an EAX environment setting.
Perhaps i could hear more of the recording?
Whilst the amp seems amazing for some music, I have to admit, not great for everything. well other than getting rid of most of the electrical noise and only recording hiss."
After a fair bit more listening, I can indeed say that there is a definite echoiness/murkiness to the sound with the GV5. It seems a touch slow, at times rather unbalanced - heavy with the bass, heavy with bright trebles and high trebles. Certainly not what I expected from the 6172.
Is this a problem with the amp, or is it allowing me to hear much more of the atmosphere and details in the recording than I have ever done before?
I have to admit that on a some recordings I really notice the amp - others less so. But when I do notice the amp it sort of makes it less clear and detailed...even though weirdly I can hear more of the words being sung.
In short....echoiness great for masses and passions, bit crummy for chamber music (really peeved me off listening to a stock dvorak piano trio).
Unfortunately I can still hear HD noise through the line out but at least no other noise unless i really crank the GV5 up or have an old recording
p.s. I LOVE the woosh when you turn it off - awesome!
"I received my low gain version of the original from norm yesterday and I have to admit, I was a bit suprised with it.
After everything people have said, I can't see how the 6172 sounds synthetic. If anything it sounds murkier than using the audio straight from my M3. If anything it sounds how i expected a 2227 might sound like.
Admittedly the amp has cut down all electrical noise (except when the HD spins for a time, but in a portable environment you don't notice). Also, the hiss disappears unless I turn the volume way up, all I'm left with is the hiss on the recording - nothing you can do about that.
However, I'm wondering if the differences I'm hearing are from the line out rather than the amp?
I was just extremely surprised at how less open the sound was than my iaudio M3. I believe within the first ten seconds I realised what a difference no crossfeed makes i guess...Any ideas?
e.g. on a recording of handel messiah ('tis the season) it felt as if I was back in the cathedral singing it with the echo the amp introduced, but in other situations it is less rewarding. Almost like an EAX environment setting.
Perhaps i could hear more of the recording?
Whilst the amp seems amazing for some music, I have to admit, not great for everything. well other than getting rid of most of the electrical noise and only recording hiss."
After a fair bit more listening, I can indeed say that there is a definite echoiness/murkiness to the sound with the GV5. It seems a touch slow, at times rather unbalanced - heavy with the bass, heavy with bright trebles and high trebles. Certainly not what I expected from the 6172.
Is this a problem with the amp, or is it allowing me to hear much more of the atmosphere and details in the recording than I have ever done before?
I have to admit that on a some recordings I really notice the amp - others less so. But when I do notice the amp it sort of makes it less clear and detailed...even though weirdly I can hear more of the words being sung.
In short....echoiness great for masses and passions, bit crummy for chamber music (really peeved me off listening to a stock dvorak piano trio).
Unfortunately I can still hear HD noise through the line out but at least no other noise unless i really crank the GV5 up or have an old recording
p.s. I LOVE the woosh when you turn it off - awesome!