Quote:
Will you please go in to further detail on this?
I'm curious as to why you feel this way about it. |
Toss fifty years of electronic innovation into the trash and do it a new way because you
must even if that way means more heavy metals in the earth and even if not orders of magnetude more trash in general.
where will all this trash go ? You can no longer recycle because this lead free product is not recylclible.You can't burn it,mash it down into sub-atomic particles,can not "vaporaize" it with a ray gun so where will it all GO ?
Into the earth as land fill so we can build homes on it ? Houses made from old DVD players ? Into the ocean for fish condos ? Garbage Art ? Schoolground equipment ? What possibly place do we have for the next generation of TRASH that as we multiply and the goods become less relaible,as third world nations advance and buy into consumerism also have their "trash" heaps what shall we DO with it ? Space trash ?
Cheap products meant to expire early so you can buy more cheap replacements.Sound familiar ?
Seems like that will be more of a nightmare than the problem this is meant ot address.
Quote:
Maybe in future we will have organic electronic products. [not quite as silly as it sounds] |
maybe in the future we can fly.Maybe we can be turned into pure energy and will no longer need to eat or breath air.The future being an unknown and the potential paths infinite no one knows where we will be as a species in another century if we survive our own stupidity but you can not MANDATE progress !
All about R&D and the natural progression of technology and should not be enforced by a law until ready to be introduced and there are "steps" that we take to make changes over time,not LEAPS that leave most behind.
RoHs is an
enforced experiment that is still in the early stages with the consumers as the crash test dummies.
Quote:
They state that these industries are exempt... but are they really? When the non-RoHS (reliable) parts become obsolete. They are forcing RoHS compliance into critical industries indirectly through part obsolesence. |
I see you have thought on this and come up with the "flaw" in the exemption theory.To say to a certain sector they need not comply realising they will have no choice by "default" because there will be no parts available to implement that exemption means again we are ALL being lied to on a grand scale.
They
know the technology is unreliable and that that can be proven,they
know unreliable electronics in the medical/military/aeronautic/aerospace and other essential services industries will actually mean dead humans so for the "press",for the public who is easily led they say these industries have full exemption from compliance while all the while kowing they have no shot at finding the parts to follow that non compliant path.
More lies and this time potentially deadly ones but hey,no more lead right ?We are saved from that while hospital equipment breaks and the wings fall off of planes