j-curve
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2002
- Posts
- 489
- Likes
- 11
The previous discussions here roused my interest in the Eggos.
First though, I have to put the boot into Sony's marketing department for pushing these as closed cans, but with an ingenious design which helps you hear what's going on around you, such as train announcements! Que? Not wanting to believe that they started with a compact, well isolated design and then punched holes in it, I prefer to interpret this as a marketing gaffe, and that the initial design was always going to be ported for the benefit of the sound. Does any sound escape from those vents when the cups are closed off? If so, is it mids or bass?
Unfortunately I haven't had a chance to sample that sound but these are my thoughts on the designs:-
D66: Features "memory metal" adjusters which revert to their original shape if bent. This could happen since they stick out once the 'phones are folded. Also features a single-sided cable but this too comes with a drawback - the connecting wire across the headband sticks out in two flimsy looking loops which are sure to catch on things and fail. Velour ear pads look comfy. 40mm driver with kick-ass magnet [same as MDR-CD380/480/580(?)]. 106 dB/mW sensitivity. 40 ohms impedance.
D22: Plastic adjusters and hinged headband may spell early retirement to the scrap heap. Two-sided "Y" cable. Vinyl ear pads may get sweaty but should seal well. 30mm driver [same as StreetStyle series and MDR-CD280(?)]. 102 dB/mW sensitivity. 24 ohms impedance.
Bottom line: Is the D66 notably better than the D22? [It costs twice the price].
My criteria:-
Circumaural, compact cans with good isolation.
Driven suitably by portable MD player without extra amp.
Sound: Harsh treble or resonant highs will not be tolerated. Elephant ear-flapping bass will not be needed.
If it sounds good on classical I'll put up with its performance on hip-hop.
Sufficiently low "gumby" factor that they can be worn in public.
First though, I have to put the boot into Sony's marketing department for pushing these as closed cans, but with an ingenious design which helps you hear what's going on around you, such as train announcements! Que? Not wanting to believe that they started with a compact, well isolated design and then punched holes in it, I prefer to interpret this as a marketing gaffe, and that the initial design was always going to be ported for the benefit of the sound. Does any sound escape from those vents when the cups are closed off? If so, is it mids or bass?
Unfortunately I haven't had a chance to sample that sound but these are my thoughts on the designs:-
D66: Features "memory metal" adjusters which revert to their original shape if bent. This could happen since they stick out once the 'phones are folded. Also features a single-sided cable but this too comes with a drawback - the connecting wire across the headband sticks out in two flimsy looking loops which are sure to catch on things and fail. Velour ear pads look comfy. 40mm driver with kick-ass magnet [same as MDR-CD380/480/580(?)]. 106 dB/mW sensitivity. 40 ohms impedance.
D22: Plastic adjusters and hinged headband may spell early retirement to the scrap heap. Two-sided "Y" cable. Vinyl ear pads may get sweaty but should seal well. 30mm driver [same as StreetStyle series and MDR-CD280(?)]. 102 dB/mW sensitivity. 24 ohms impedance.
Bottom line: Is the D66 notably better than the D22? [It costs twice the price].
My criteria:-
Circumaural, compact cans with good isolation.
Driven suitably by portable MD player without extra amp.
Sound: Harsh treble or resonant highs will not be tolerated. Elephant ear-flapping bass will not be needed.
If it sounds good on classical I'll put up with its performance on hip-hop.
Sufficiently low "gumby" factor that they can be worn in public.