Monoprice Monolith AMT Headphones
May 1, 2024 at 6:55 AM Post #307 of 314
has anyone else tried this mod before? if so what were your results?
I have tried this mod out of curiosity. The changes described by the user are indeed real; you lose the extra "dullness" and "boominess" that the AMT may show due to internal reflections/resonances, getting a more natural sound. However, I reverted to stock configuration shortly after because when I tried the polyfill mod the drivers had roughly 20hrs of use and, as it seems that AMT's generally take quite long to break in, I preferred to wait and see what's the progression of their tonal signature and balance over time. This is actually evolving and improving (currently around the 100hrs mark, but I have read users suggesting to wait until a 500hr-period of break-in is completed - whether this is realistic or just placebo, I don't know); there is still some extra boom and dullness according to my taste, in particular with heavy and dynamic music, so if this won't change with time, I may apply again the polyfill mod.
 
May 1, 2024 at 10:52 AM Post #308 of 314
I have tried this mod out of curiosity. The changes described by the user are indeed real; you lose the extra "dullness" and "boominess" that the AMT may show due to internal reflections/resonances, getting a more natural sound. However, I reverted to stock configuration shortly after because when I tried the polyfill mod the drivers had roughly 20hrs of use and, as it seems that AMT's generally take quite long to break in, I preferred to wait and see what's the progression of their tonal signature and balance over time. This is actually evolving and improving (currently around the 100hrs mark, but I have read users suggesting to wait until a 500hr-period of break-in is completed - whether this is realistic or just placebo, I don't know); there is still some extra boom and dullness according to my taste, in particular with heavy and dynamic music, so if this won't change with time, I may apply again the polyfill mod.
Thank you for this! I was thinking the same for burn in time as well! I have around 35-40 hours, so I'm guessing I need a bit more. At first they felt a bit veiled but there were some slight improvements after some time with it. Again, not sure if its just placebo as you mentioned. The polyfill mod is definitely something I will be trying.
 
May 2, 2024 at 2:37 PM Post #309 of 314
Thank you for this! I was thinking the same for burn in time as well! I have around 35-40 hours, so I'm guessing I need a bit more. At first they felt a bit veiled but there were some slight improvements after some time with it. Again, not sure if its just placebo as you mentioned. The polyfill mod is definitely something I will be trying.
Just tried the mod. I'm pleasantly surprised. Tighter bass response, much airier treble. I wonder if other material would work better.
 
May 3, 2024 at 12:37 PM Post #312 of 314
My personal mod is here:
resonant chamber of non direct reflection, then filled... so sound is more natural than ever. Always punch, detailed, dynamic.
.

WhatsApp Image 2022-03-26 at 23.47.23 (2).jpeg
I am somewhat interested in your mod. Could you explain the process of getting at the resonant spaces surrounding the drive unit, and the exact material you used to fill these spaces? It looks like glass wool insulation, which might have the disadsvantage of shedding a lot of particles that would affect the driver surfaces. I would assume it should be some sort of organic wool speaker stuffing material.
 
May 5, 2024 at 5:39 AM Post #313 of 314
Yeah I forgot to mention that too. Sound stage seems to be almost the same but the imaging improved significantly. The placements of instruments are better.
Good to hear, that somehow confirms my memories - unaltered soundstage but sharper and more precise imaging. This may help in taking my future decision on the mod.
 
Last edited:
May 8, 2024 at 2:43 PM Post #314 of 314
Has anyone tried to recreate the Soundguys' EQ suggestions for the Monolith AMT? There were no parametric EQ values so I tried to recreate the EQ curve, but it's quite difficult.

https://www.soundguys.com/monolith-by-monoprice-amt-review-65005/

Here's what they recommended:
Screenshot 2024-05-08 175925.png


Mine:
amt EQ curve.png


EQ settings:
Code:
Preamp: -6 dB
Filter 1: OFF PK Fc 45 Hz Gain 3.0 dB Q 1.000
Filter 2: OFF LSC Fc 80 Hz Gain 3.0 dB Q 0.400
Filter 3: ON LSC Fc 30 Hz Gain 5.5 dB Q 0.900
Filter 4: ON PK Fc 30 Hz Gain 2.0 dB Q 3.000
Filter 5: ON HSC Fc 40 Hz Gain -5.0 dB Q 0.800
Filter 6: ON PK Fc 180 Hz Gain -2.4 dB Q 1.100
Filter 7: ON PK Fc 510 Hz Gain -2.8 dB Q 1.900
Filter 8: ON PK Fc 950 Hz Gain -1.0 dB Q 1.100
Filter 9: ON PK Fc 1100 Hz Gain -2.5 dB Q 3.800
Filter 10: ON HSC Fc 1400 Hz Gain 14.6 dB Q 1.200
Filter 11: ON PK Fc 1850 Hz Gain -13.0 dB Q 2.300
Filter 12: ON PK Fc 3200 Hz Gain -5.0 dB Q 4.500
Filter 13: ON HSC Fc 4650 Hz Gain -13.0 dB Q 1.000
Filter 14: ON PK Fc 5300 Hz Gain -4.0 dB Q 4.000
Filter 15: ON PK Fc 8000 Hz Gain -5.8 dB Q 1.300
Filter 16: ON PK Fc 9000 Hz Gain 4.0 dB Q 5.000

Filters 1 & 2 (both OFF) might be removed when importing to PEACE. They're not supposed to be part of the EQ but I quickly added them because it seems bass light.

They also say "We recommend setting your preamp to -6dB... [and] anything below 100Hz and above 12.5kHz can be ignored" So yeah, I'll probably try adjusting those areas & more to preference at some point. I think the frequency response after their EQ would resemble their SoundGuys Studio Curve v1.1 target, not Harman.

unfortunately its very quiet for me, a bit hard to listen to because equipment is insufficient.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top