I have my CFA, Carbon, and Blue Hawaii running and I have been playing a song, pausing, and switching between the 3 with the CBRN2.
To my ears the CFA is slightly less bright then the Carbon while maintaining the Carbon bass. Maybe the bass is a tad better controlled too. This isn't science, I am not volume matching them down to .1 db like I should be, just playing by ear.
I read CFA technology is "quicker" the conventional amps at reacting to changes in the signal. Might be a bunch of marketing BS but I could see that.
The CFA is still too "ooo new shiny" for me to be sure.