droid23
100+ Head-Fier
Wow, thanks for your insights!It is fairly consistent. I did a review of NiceHCKs 4 core pure silver cable vs their 8 cored version. More material means, usually double the cost. As per sound performance it seems to be that there is simply more material that has an influence on how you would percieve its sound performance. Its not exactly double the stage percetion and double the depth perception. I would say its more like 5-15% extra depending on the level of cable your dealing with. ARES S is a 4 wired UPOCC vs the ARES 8w. There is a definitely noticeable expansion of stage, greater note weight of sound and depth of sound as a result. Even them cheaper pure NiceHCK silver cables, did something similar with greater expansion of stage and better depth.
The only issue with thicker 8 cored variants of cables is that some are just too thick and heavy. A cable should not be so unweldly that you can't have freedom of movement or are so heavy that they are relagated for just home use. Which kinda defeats the purpose of an IEM use case scenario. There are 2-4 core cable variants that use so much material that it is impossible to make an 8 wired version. These are more like an 8-16 cored cable but designed to only use 2-4cores.
Take Effect Audios Code 23 for example. That cable is a thick 2 cored 16.5AWG cable. So thick the cable is a bit too stiff. Reason why they made a revision of it called the Code 24C. Which uses much less material but comes fairly close to the performance of the Code 23. So in the end it really comes down to material, geometry of said material, hardware used like plugs and connectors which leads to the overall sound enhancing performance of the given cable.
Generally if a lighter 4 cored cable is a nicely resolving solid quality cable. Its a good bet that doubling the same material in an 8 cored version will give you better performance. Again not exactly double the performance but it will increase the best aspects of that material. However this is highly dependend on the quality. Less qualtiy and its difficult to tell from a 4 core to an 8 core.
The outlier is if you use a highly resolving 4 cored UPOCC cable- this will be better performing than lets say some random 8cored or 16 cored version of a cable from aliexpress that claim to be 7n crystal copper. I own penty of 8 cored and even a few 16 cored copper cables that can't touch the resolving ability of the ARES S in 4 cores.
One of my favorite sets are the DUNU SA6 MkII, with their rather unique "psychoacoustical brainf**k" tuning in the upper mids, presence, and mid treble region, but their soundstage, or better their perceived depth is known to be not the most impressive, the rest is awesome. So, I was eyeballing the Ares S (4core) for some days because of other rather raving reviews, but wasn't sure yet.. now your description come in very handy, thanks again.
Would you recommend this cable (or better a 8 core version? even though I'd cry to spend nearly 300) if I would like to improve the SA6's sound stage? Or would there be another cable you could recommend for that matter? What about the Cadmus series, or the Eros?
Last edited: