kwkarth
Electronics guys... we have our plusses and minuses. With advent of digital everything, we're being phased out
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2001
- Posts
- 10,307
- Likes
- 100
Quote:
I wasn't asking about the working angle, I was asking about the working distance. Some microphones exhibit great reach and some do not, and this is irrespective of pickup pattern or acceptance angle. I would glad to give you some recommendations if you'll give me the working conditions. The Sure Beta mics all have poor working distance so they're ok for individual performers who are individually using the mics, but they're a bad choice for micing choral groups working at any distance. There are much better mics for that purpose.
Originally Posted by joneeboi /img/forum/go_quote.gif As far as any of us knows, it's 45 degrees and a little ways ahead of your chin. infinitesymphony: You're right about the singing in front of loudspeakers thing. At this point it's becoming obvious to me that all these differences are subtle enough to ignore, but better to know than to not know, correcto? So performance-wise, the Beta would be preferable and have relatively less pickup from the speaker almost directly behind the singer? We don't have a chorus yet, so most uses will be between a single vocalist and a single mic. Interestingly enough, the Shure website lists the 57 (both SM and Beta) as instrument mics and both 58s as vocal mics. Seems pretty clear at this point. |
I wasn't asking about the working angle, I was asking about the working distance. Some microphones exhibit great reach and some do not, and this is irrespective of pickup pattern or acceptance angle. I would glad to give you some recommendations if you'll give me the working conditions. The Sure Beta mics all have poor working distance so they're ok for individual performers who are individually using the mics, but they're a bad choice for micing choral groups working at any distance. There are much better mics for that purpose.