Tic Toc Click Clock.....Is LHY working on a DAC or what? - its so obvious they need one that fits the design language of the color theme they got going on....
Any rumours?
Any rumours?
I wonder if they will post measurements of it lolTic Toc Click Clock.....Is LHY working on a DAC or what? - its so obvious they need one that fits the design language of the color theme they got going on....
Any rumours?
Hmm why? Are they hiding measurments or?I wonder if they will post measurements of it lol
I dont find measurements on Aune either. They actually have new one..
They removed their clock measurements because they were inaccurate and didn’t want to measure them individually.
what you're getting is a glorified tone-control
I don't think that's completely true.Everybody's cashing in on the new 10 MHz clock market. Unless you use it as a Master Clock, which most people aren't doing, what you're getting is a glorified tone-control as @chesebert pointed out in a different thread. And because of this, and because of personal preference, you don't necessarily have to spend a lot of money to get a result you want, if we're talking about clocking one device. If you want accurate sound and clock multiple devices, that is going to cost some money.
I think the master clock effect on DDC or DAC is very depends on how the device DDC/DAC use of the master 10Mhz clock, e.g. my SU2, there has PLL IC, VCXO and circuit to fine tune the VCXO frequency by reference to the 10Mhz clock, although I have no idea how the PLL can change the phase of VCXO to decrease jitter, but the result is really positive, I can hear more detail compare with internal clock, it is not huge difference but the positive change is there.Everybody's cashing in on the new 10 MHz clock market. Unless you use it as a Master Clock, which most people aren't doing, what you're getting is a glorified tone-control as @chesebert pointed out in a different thread. And because of this, and because of personal preference, you don't necessarily have to spend a lot of money to get a result you want, if we're talking about clocking one device. If you want accurate sound and clock multiple devices, that is going to cost some money.
The reason for not providing the phase noise measurements is most likely because the equipment to do these on levels below -115dBc/1Hz are crazy expensive. When I asked Alvin he referred to contact a third party lab owning and working with these high precision tools. Mutec and Cybershaft have them inhouse and as far as I understand AfterDark also have access to such gear/lab. We cannot expect the smaller clock workshops to own these tools. If trying to use lower grade equipment for these measurements the equipments own internal phase noise will be shown in the graphs.I dont find measurements on Aune either. They actually have new one..
https://www.auneaudio-europe.com/product/s1c-high-performance-audio-clock/
They also have a non WC version that is cheaper.
https://www.audiophonics.fr/en/hifi...-sine-signal-square-signal-black-p-17430.html
While I agree one doesn't have to spend much for a decent clock (e.g. OCK-2), the comparison of not using a master clock as the central time keeper and calling it glorified tone control is asinine.Everybody's cashing in on the new 10 MHz clock market. Unless you use it as a Master Clock, which most people aren't doing, what you're getting is a glorified tone-control as @chesebert pointed out in a different thread. And because of this, and because of personal preference, you don't necessarily have to spend a lot of money to get a result you want, if we're talking about clocking one device. If you want accurate sound and clock multiple devices, that is going to cost some money.
But I found a measurement result of OCK1 is lower than -100dBz/1hz from another forum, those guys informed Jay's Audio boss about this, then Jay's Audio removed the measurement result from LHY Taobao shop. Because of this result, I aborted to order OCK1/2.The reason for not providing the phase noise measurements is most likely because the equipment to do these on levels below -115dBc/1Hz are crazy expensive. When I asked Alvin he referred to contact a third party lab owning and working with these high precision tools. Mutec and Cybershaft have them inhouse and as far as I understand AfterDark also have access to such gear/lab. We cannot expect the smaller clock workshops to own these tools. If trying to use lower grade equipment for these measurements the equipments own internal phase noise will be shown in the graphs.
I am sure serious sources of OCXO's for let say LHY keep the delivered units (clocks) in spec. Jay's Audio should never jeopardize their reputation by putting in lower spec OCXO's than advertized <-110dBc/1Hz for OCK-1 and <-115dBz/1Hz for OCK-2. I should really appreciate a third party skilled lab team to measure up a a few OCK-2's just to kill the unhealthy "debate without proof"
/Jan
I have heard of that but I still don't take it for true. -Who did the measurement and with what equipment, calibrated when....? and so on.But I found a measurement result of OCK1 is lower than -100dBz/1hz from another forum, those guys informed Jay's Audio boss about this, then Jay's Audio removed the measurement result from LHY Taobao shop. Because of this result, I aborted to order OCK1/2.