morfic
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Posts
- 284
- Likes
- 10
I got used to looking at frequency response numbers, the wider the range, the better, a 30-16Khz would not sound as good as a 6Hz - 23kHz (human range left our of this example). (This held true for me in the past)
After some back and forth reading on head-fi.org i settled on a pair of UE Super.Fi 3 Studio, with a range of 20-13kHz, they'd seem to be lacking, but they are not.
I like them and chose them based on reading repeatedly that they have a ver flat response. Kind of as a baseline first IEM that fit my $100 price tag.
Bass is good *if* i don't lose my seal, which i now most of the time keep w/o issues. What astonishes me is the mids and highs in a quiet room with the Zen turned way down (like 3-4 out of 24(25?)).
So is there any point to looking at the frequency response range on IEMs at all? My old way of looking at phones tells me i am missing about 9kHz of range. My ears tell me it's all there.
After some while with the Super.Fi 3, i'd like to look into some Super.Fi 5 Pro or ER-4P or others in this price range, having a very black and white analytical mind, i crave cold hard numbers i can peruse in my decision making, since i'd like to *avoid* trying 5 pairs, just to build my opinion about them.
Anything you could provide to help me further "quantify quality" (i know, it's getting pretty subjective, but as i am into photography, the way a lens draws appeals differently, but other things like resolution can still be quantified by some measures if one is interested in measurable details, and i like to look at both, subjective and objective measures)
Thanks for reading all of this,
Daniel
After some back and forth reading on head-fi.org i settled on a pair of UE Super.Fi 3 Studio, with a range of 20-13kHz, they'd seem to be lacking, but they are not.
I like them and chose them based on reading repeatedly that they have a ver flat response. Kind of as a baseline first IEM that fit my $100 price tag.
Bass is good *if* i don't lose my seal, which i now most of the time keep w/o issues. What astonishes me is the mids and highs in a quiet room with the Zen turned way down (like 3-4 out of 24(25?)).
So is there any point to looking at the frequency response range on IEMs at all? My old way of looking at phones tells me i am missing about 9kHz of range. My ears tell me it's all there.
After some while with the Super.Fi 3, i'd like to look into some Super.Fi 5 Pro or ER-4P or others in this price range, having a very black and white analytical mind, i crave cold hard numbers i can peruse in my decision making, since i'd like to *avoid* trying 5 pairs, just to build my opinion about them.
Anything you could provide to help me further "quantify quality" (i know, it's getting pretty subjective, but as i am into photography, the way a lens draws appeals differently, but other things like resolution can still be quantified by some measures if one is interested in measurable details, and i like to look at both, subjective and objective measures)
Thanks for reading all of this,
Daniel