HeadphoneNewbiee
New Head-Fier
Hello, let me start by saying how glad I am that I found this forum. It ultimately was what led me to purchase my first electrostatic headphone setup. Now I am no veteran in regards to headphones in fact I'm quite a noob. The only headphones (or sets) ive ever owned before was a razer black shark and a wow headset, blashphemy I know! However I have long been interested in getting a nice pair of headphones focusing only on the sound with no attachements like microphone etc. I knew I wanted a headphone with amplification so I looked for sennheiser hd600/650 (and other similar alternatives) since they seem to be very well established headphones from what I can read on this forum and other places. But then I stumpled upon the fascinating electrostatic headphones which I read is the creme de la creme of headphone technology.
Long story short I looked online for used electostats and ended up purchasing a srx mk3 and a srm-313 amplifier. The problem then is that I just can't get them to sound right and this is where I hope that this is because of my setup rather than the inherent sound of the headphones.
I have read the glossary description and I'll try to describe and compare the sound of my just purchased srx mk3 and my razer blackshark.
First of all with the srx mk3 every sound (that is not bass) is incredibly clear, I think the words analytical and articulate fits well. This is a bit in contrary to my razer blackshark which is much more bassy but also much more blanketed I can however partly "remove the blanket" just using EQ. In the inverse case, bringing out the base on the srx, seems impossible no matter what settings I use they just don't have that oomphf. My blackshark definetly feels fuller than my srx which is a big problem when I listen to classical music as I just cannot feel the bass (or maybe technically sub-bass?) in any way what so ever and knowing that the bass is missing it frankly sounds worse with my srx.
To sum up I would say that the srx feels breathy, bright and natural while the blackshark that I'm used to is definetely less natural, blanketed but has better bass/sub-bass.
I don't know if I used the terms correctly but I did my best.
Is there anything to be done about the bass/sub-bass or does it simply not have the frequency range to play certain music in which case would it be worth to buy a newer pro bias electrostat, say the L300?
Long story short I looked online for used electostats and ended up purchasing a srx mk3 and a srm-313 amplifier. The problem then is that I just can't get them to sound right and this is where I hope that this is because of my setup rather than the inherent sound of the headphones.
I have read the glossary description and I'll try to describe and compare the sound of my just purchased srx mk3 and my razer blackshark.
First of all with the srx mk3 every sound (that is not bass) is incredibly clear, I think the words analytical and articulate fits well. This is a bit in contrary to my razer blackshark which is much more bassy but also much more blanketed I can however partly "remove the blanket" just using EQ. In the inverse case, bringing out the base on the srx, seems impossible no matter what settings I use they just don't have that oomphf. My blackshark definetly feels fuller than my srx which is a big problem when I listen to classical music as I just cannot feel the bass (or maybe technically sub-bass?) in any way what so ever and knowing that the bass is missing it frankly sounds worse with my srx.
To sum up I would say that the srx feels breathy, bright and natural while the blackshark that I'm used to is definetely less natural, blanketed but has better bass/sub-bass.
I don't know if I used the terms correctly but I did my best.
Is there anything to be done about the bass/sub-bass or does it simply not have the frequency range to play certain music in which case would it be worth to buy a newer pro bias electrostat, say the L300?