Wow, those chathams look great...
So, hypothetically, what do i need to make my 6sn7 sockets ready for those 6as7s?
I know I need a external power supply, but what exact board do I need?
And do I have to short one connection in my adapters and wire it to the power supply?
Is that how you can achieve this?
Sorry but I have no clue about these external power supply things...
Hi CR13. Glad to see you're keeping an eye on the thread...are you a glutton for punishment, or what?!
.
Also glad that gibosi (as always!) looks out for us all, and has given you good info - even though he doesn't have power tubes himself (is that keen, or what?!). Thanks also to mordy for his assistance...again, as always...I must admit, though, that my 12V, 6A, AC/DC power supply (for LED string lights, CCTV cameras etc) that can be found on ebay for $7 to $9 (free shipping from China) or $8 + shipping from Amazon, has been doing the job marvellously...no shortcomings in bass or detail/clarity in my set-up at least (I do have a good mains filter/conditioner for all my equipment though...).
I must admit the TS Chatham in the photo is a
tad sexier than the clear-top, bottom getter (older) Chathams, but that's just being picky - they too are real sexy, lol! And the sound is so good from 'em that I can't even yet be bothered to take them out and test the TS/Ch'm!
That's identical to the one that dies on me... Loved that tube lol
I feel your pain, kvt...please tell me they aren't short-lived!
.
Thanks for the pic! I have seen bottom getter Chatham 6AS7's with the same exact plates, that is, an unpainted band at the top and bottom, and yellow lettering on the base, so there is no doubt in my mind yours is a "real" Chatham.
As your tube was packed in 1960, one might speculate that Chatham's with top getters were all manufactured around 1960 and later. And perhaps, those with bottom getters were probably manufactured in the 1950's. So for example, a couple of bottom getter Chathams I see on eBay, dated 639 and 522 were probably manufactured in the 1956 and 1955, respectively.
Yes, I have Chathams with and without the unpainted bands. And it does look like the later ones - especially when Tung Sol became involved - went over to top getters. So the moral of the tale is to make absolutely sure one gets the Tung Sol/Chatham
proper, if going Tung Sol (mine off ebay had photos, so I was OK. The one that came NOT off ebay, and with no pic, was just "Tung Sol" and thus - it would appear - the inferior (IMHO) RCA).
Hey Girls!
You need to check this post out for a nice bit of research from a MK III owner!
http://www.head-fi.org/t/439449/little-dot-mk-iii-mods/135#post_10697619
That, TD, is for AMAZONIAN girls methinks! Most of us are far lesser mortals, I fear! From the look of things, there's one Hell of a lot of parameters to be aware of when dabbling in the finer points of amp electronics...and the opportunity for one Hell of a lot of (expensive) mistakes lol!!
The more I TRY to make sense of what's going on with DIYers, the more amazed I am at what these LDs can keep taking without
major objection/catastrophe! Long live the little marvels - hopefully!
Edit: ps...nice to see at least
some useful upgrades in the MKIV SE