mordy
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2010
- Posts
- 7,776
- Likes
- 7,588
Hi LA,
Does this tube have a metal base?
Does this tube have a metal base?
Just received 4 Reflektor made 6H9C octals and so far they are no slouch compared to the more pricey Tung sol or Sylvanias and all of that for $9.00 +shipping good deal i would say .
I can use 6SN7 to 6AS7 as powertubes and 6SL7 and 6SN7 as drivers. ECC32 should work too as driver, but they are far too expensive. Power consumption of amp is around 88w with 6080's and 6SN7's. So now i can use my precious 6SU7GTY's. With -73 6N13S's i received four -65 6N8S with square getter. So far they sound very good. I think this model should be the best of non-metal base 6N8S's. http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/251379277920
Are you using the 1965 6N8S as a driver tube?
Are you using the 1965 6N8S as a driver tube?
Nearly all time i have been listening with this amp i have used pair of 6N8S '65 as drivers. Also listened some time with sylvania 6SN7GTA's. Those are pretty good too.
6SN7 update:
Therefore, the Tung Sol is the tube I recommend to those of you who are just now getting up to speed with the 6SN7. Like the Orange Globe, it serves as a credible benchmark. It is the tube to beat. It is good enough, that many feel no need to get something better. And at any rate, it is excellent introduction to the 6SN7.
Sorry for asking, as I thought it was probably mentioned some pages ago: do the 6SN7 (as driver tubes) need a separate power supply for the heaters (6.3V) ?
And what about the heathers power supply for the 6H9C ?
Thanks
What are your thoughts about the difference between your favorite 6SN7 and the 6SL7 tubes you tried?
Also, what are your thoughts on the differences between the 6SN7 and 6CG7/6CQ7 tubes, since they are supposed to be a successor to the 6SN7 tube?
My questions pertain to using these tubes as driver tubes.