Oddball
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2003
- Posts
- 1,861
- Likes
- 11
Interesting, so the plot thickens. Does the PPA normally run off batteries? How much is the Lab-Grade power supply? The PPA still looks darn cool though.
Originally posted by Sugano-san Sound: Very clear, very powerful, very deep bass. Lots of detail. Very dynamic. Incredible that so much sound emanates from such a small enclosure. |
Originally posted by Oddball Interesting, so the plot thickens. Does the PPA normally run off batteries? How much is the Lab-Grade power supply? The PPA still looks darn cool though. |
Originally posted by Oddball Interesting, so the plot thickens. Does the PPA normally run off batteries? How much is the Lab-Grade power supply? |
Originally posted by Oddball Interesting, so the plot thickens. Does the PPA normally run off batteries? How much is the Lab-Grade power supply? The PPA still looks darn cool though. |
Originally posted by Oddball So can I assume that the PPA needs a whole lot of batteries to run? How many? I keep on hearing people calling it portable, but isn't it a pretty big amp relatively speaking? The battery board would add space, and create a transportable for those hardcore audiophiles. Dang...$300. But I think it's pretty cool that there are so many customizable features. |
Originally posted by Sugano-san This amplifier is so much more than "just another portable". It can cope with the finest sources' output. If I had to characterize the PR's sound in one word, that word would be "accuracy". Not only does it reveal an enormous amount of detail, it does so without sibilance and based on a deep, deep bass foundation. Feed this amp's output into some high-quality cans, close your eyes and *feel* the bass! Then open your eyes, look at the tiny chassis and stand in awe. What energy and dynamics from such a small box -- and that's without using the bass boost. The crystal clear treble and the hugely informative midrange just add to the experience. But up to now I had tried the PR only connected to my stationary sources, i.e., turntable and CD player. Yesterday evening I used it for the first time with some portable CD players. The PR highlights the differences in sound quality without any reserve. The sound from the D-303 was so much better than that of any other portable player I tried, and at the same time it was so far removed from the level of sound quality that the PR produced with my stationary CD player, while nuances remained clearly discernable, that I can only say that the PR exhibits charcteristics of a measuring instrument in this respect. The PR does not appear to add a lot of anything to the sound, thus it is really easy to spot the differences in different sources. At the same time its reserves are so immense that it easily reproduces the finer and subtler qualities of a great-sounding source, and that's more than a number of perhaps more expensive (but dull-sounding) amplifiers can say about themselves (if they could only speak...). I would suspect that a maxed-out Larocco PPA does all of the above even better than the PR, but if you consider that the prototype version of the PR is nothing else but the forefather of the PPA, it's not surprising that the production version of the PR is an amplifier of the highest caliber considering its size and its price. But the real point of this post is: The PR is an amplifier of the highest caliber even if you do *not* take into account its size and its price. And that's worth pointing out. Thank you for your interest. |
Originally posted by Sugano-san But the real point of this post is: The PR is an amplifier of the highest caliber even if you do *not* take into account its size and its price. And that's worth pointing out. |
Originally posted by DLeeWebb Or is it dead silent like the XP-7 with the 797 is supposed to be...? |