L.K.S. Audio MH-DA004 Dual ES9038PRO DAC - Van Damme's double impact?
Jul 4, 2021 at 8:23 PM Post #4,051 of 4,419
The above measurement shows that with a sufficiently large power supply cap, input 100/120Hz ripple is reduced to below the regulator noise floor.

In this instance the measurement number is literally the regulator self noise.
 
Last edited:
Jul 5, 2021 at 5:41 AM Post #4,053 of 4,419
Yesterday i dug out one of my 20 years old x100/1000 noise measurement Preamplifiers.
In my 004 there was still the original LM317 pre Regulator for the CPU Supply.
Since I placed SMB sockets all over the place, it was very easy to messure befor and after exchanging the LM317 against a LT3081.

The Measurement setup was not changed , and was keept on during the regulator Upgrade. No position of cables or Instruments was changed, everything stade exactly at the same place.

LM317 CPU Regulator output in LKS 004
CPU Sec. REW x100  LM317.jpg


LT3081 CPU Regulator output in LKS 004 ( 1µ Set Pin Capacitor )
CPU Sec. REW x100  LT3081.jpg


Noiseflore of measurement system
noise flore.jpg



Ripple rejection of the LT3081 is about 10 dB better the the LM317, and Nois flore is about 6-8dB lower with the LT3081.
Not to talk about the massive Sonic improvement.
 
Jul 5, 2021 at 11:49 PM Post #4,054 of 4,419
Ripple rejection of the LT3081 is about 10 dB better the the LM317, and Nois flore is about 6-8dB lower with the LT3081.
Not to talk about the massive Sonic improvement.
The noise peaks at 50Hz and 100Hz are 84uV and 56uV, a little higher that what I measured on the LT3083 at 40uV.
When averaged over a 200kHz bandwidth, I expect the number to fall into the same ballpark.

Ripple becomes a non issue once the 2nd stage regulator comes into play.
60dB PSRR@50Hz can be expected from any good voltage regulator, that is a 1000x reduction in the ripple amplitude.

LT30xx devices are not super quiet, I chose the LT3083 as a modern low cost replacement for the LM317.
It is capable supplying more current and being able to handle transient loads that cause a step change in the current.

It had to have a noise profile no worse than the LM317, the 10dB improvement is a modest performance bonus.

If you want to reduce noise further replace the second stage, noise floor is 4uV on Gen2s and 20uV on Gen1s
The Belleson SPLX I am using has a noise floor of 1uV and reacts to load changes 10x faster than the LT30xx
 
Last edited:
Jul 6, 2021 at 9:09 AM Post #4,055 of 4,419
Yesterday I made a comparison measurement of three LKS 004 regulators :

CPU Regulator Sec. Output x100 with a LT3081 Regulator ( green )
Core Regulator Sec. Output x100 with 2x LT3081 Regulators in Parallel ( red )
DAC Analog Regulator Sec. Output x100 with a Belleson SPLX ( blue )
Noise Floor ( purple )

The Belleson has the lowes noise. But i it looks like the lt3081 has better ripple rejection ????
I attached the REW files to this post :)

1625575596368.png

1625576562350.png

1625576598900.png

1625576637947.png

1625576674639.png
 

Attachments

  • Core CPU DAC_Analog.zip
    3.1 MB · Views: 0
Jul 6, 2021 at 11:33 PM Post #4,056 of 4,419
Yesterday I made a comparison measurement of three LKS 004 regulators :

CPU Regulator Sec. Output x100 with a LT3081 Regulator ( green )
Core Regulator Sec. Output x100 with 2x LT3081 Regulators in Parallel ( red )
DAC Analog Regulator Sec. Output x100 with a Belleson SPLX ( blue )
Noise Floor ( purple )

The Belleson has the lowes noise. But i it looks like the lt3081 has better ripple rejection ????
I attached the REW files to this post :)





These traces appear to have been taken on 3 different circuits with different load conditions and differences in input and output filtering.

The voltage level of ripple at the input must be exactly the same in all cases to make any meaningful comparisons of ripple reduction.

Similarly the output filter cap and output load conditions has to be exactly the same in order to evaluate any differences in noise performance.
 
Last edited:
Jul 7, 2021 at 7:47 AM Post #4,057 of 4,419
You will need to connect pin 14 of the HDMI connector to ground.
This gives you PCM only playback.

LKS follows the PS-Audio layout if you are outputting PCM except the master clock connection is not needed.
Hi B0bb,
Is there an opposite way to get the LKS i2s only in DSD mode?
PCM works flawlessly from my Hifiberry digi+ pro. But when I set Roon to DSD64 (Max setting digi+) it stays in PCM 176 locked but no sound. I’ve enabled DSD over PCM in Raspberry settings.
Anything I’m missing?
 

Attachments

  • 4DB37C27-E210-4A77-81A8-6E898D074DFF.jpeg
    4DB37C27-E210-4A77-81A8-6E898D074DFF.jpeg
    835.1 KB · Views: 0
Jul 7, 2021 at 6:02 PM Post #4,058 of 4,419
Hi B0bb,
Is there an opposite way to get the LKS i2s only in DSD mode?
PCM works flawlessly from my Hifiberry digi+ pro. But when I set Roon to DSD64 (Max setting digi+) it stays in PCM 176 locked but no sound. I’ve enabled DSD over PCM in Raspberry settings.
Anything I’m missing?
The software running on the RPi has to be configured to report the DAC is DSD DoP capable.
Roon is quite picky about this.

More info on checking for this.
https://help.roonlabs.com/portal/en/kb/articles/conversion-to-pcm
https://community.roonlabs.com/t/what-is-required-for-native-dsd-on-linux/20795
 
Jul 7, 2021 at 6:41 PM Post #4,059 of 4,419
Jul 10, 2021 at 6:15 AM Post #4,060 of 4,419
En breve pondré las medidas de mi analizador de hp en las fuentes de alimentación, mientras me divierto con el pcb supercaps Maxim, estoy fabricando una carga electrónica ajustable hasta 10A con un mosfet de potencia y uno operacional entre otros elementos, sin esto no yo puede hacer pruebas reales antes de instalarlo en el dac.
 

Attachments

  • 20210710_120512.jpg
    20210710_120512.jpg
    1.4 MB · Views: 0
  • 20210710_124408.jpg
    20210710_124408.jpg
    3.3 MB · Views: 0
Last edited:
Jul 11, 2021 at 4:45 AM Post #4,061 of 4,419
En breve pondré las medidas de mi analizador de hp en las fuentes de alimentación, mientras me divierto con el pcb supercaps Maxim, estoy fabricando una carga electrónica ajustable hasta 10A con un mosfet de potencia y uno operacional entre otros elementos, sin esto no yo puede hacer pruebas reales antes de instalarlo en el dac.
I am very curious what your findings will be.
 
Jul 11, 2021 at 8:04 AM Post #4,062 of 4,419
004'te 9038 sarf malzemeleri için dijital ve analog birbirine bağlı, kartı kesmeden pek bir şey yapamıyor.
Belleson SPX17'yi kullandım, yaklaşık 6 kat daha ucuz olduğu için LT3083 ile değiştirilebilir.
11387903.jpeg



Ayrık seri şönt analog kaynağının değiştirilmesini kastediyorsanız, bu çok fazla iş ve stok düzenleyicileri yeterince iyi bir iş çıkarıyor.
004'te 9038 sarf malzemeleri için dijital ve analog birbirine bağlı, kartı kesmeden pek bir şey yapamıyor.
Belleson SPX17'yi kullandım, yaklaşık 6 kat daha ucuz olduğu için LT3083 ile değiştirilebilir.
11387903.jpeg



Ayrık seri şönt analog kaynağının değiştirilmesini kastediyorsanız, bu çok fazla iş ve stok düzenleyicileri yeterince iyi bir iş çıkarıyor.
Merhaba Bob
bellesson kartı kaç volt olmalıdır.3.3v? 5v?
 
Jul 11, 2021 at 1:36 PM Post #4,063 of 4,419
B0bb, Xoverman, this is the electronic load that I have designed to test the supercapacitor module, I think it is enough to be able to see many parameters such as the dreaded charge noise of 350Khz, 5v are necessary for the oamp and the power supply of the visualizer display V / A (this will be disconnectable), I do not know if they should be 5v low noise or this is not critical.
 

Attachments

  • fin (2).jpg
    fin (2).jpg
    66.8 KB · Views: 0

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top