b0bb
Headphoneus Supremus
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2014
- Posts
- 1,663
- Likes
- 888
The MQA capability is an interesting technical curiosity, I am not convinced about its merits to pay extra for the feature.Thank you very much for your extended and professional response, "b0bb". I, as you may have already guessed, am inexperienced in all this "overhauling" of a dac, so my use of the LKS would be as it comes from the factory. But I have been reading the opinions of the users of this dac in forums for more than a year and I have always read good things about it, except that at first it seemed to accumulate a lot of heat, but I think that is already solved. Another option would be the Matrix X-Sabre Pro "mqa", but I don't know if it would be a better option and it deserves that extra expense. And yes, it is true, the price of the LKS has not dropped, it has remained the same or more expensive. I am thinking of buying it on "Clear Components", a German website on eBay. Thank you very much "b0bb" for your opinion and if you want to tell me something more or anything, I will be happy to read you. Greetings to all...
The closed proprietary nature of MQA is not something I want in my music library.
MQA was introduced in 2014, at that time hi-res audio was not widely available, it promised the hi-res experience with the bandwidth requirement of CD Redbook audio
In the last 6 years there was a substantial increase hi-res audio for sale at reasonable prices without needing MQA, this makes MQA somewhat redundant.
Most of the affordable hi-res music available comes from small independent dealers and I spend my money with them to keep this going for as long as possible.
MQA has a niche in the Tidal streaming service, if you like the catalog on offer and will pay the asking price (240USD/yr), MQA might be interesting.
Last edited: