KGSShv Carbon - hows it sound with the 009s?

Sep 23, 2015 at 3:42 PM Post #61 of 834
 
 
As for DACs, yeah that's important too, but the 3K/Yggy/R2R thing isn't a requirement. Just don't get a bright DAC; not all DS are bright (e.g. Eximus DP1 is nice and warm). I've also been very happy with the lowly NAD M51, which retails at only 2K and can be had for just over 1K used. I have a very nice analog setup for my speakers (Clearaudio Innovation, Graham Phantom, Koetsu Onyx, Ortofon Cadenza, etc), and I haven't felt the need to bring it over to the Stax setup -- the sound from the M51/KGSShv/009 is top notch as-is.

 
This is my newbie SR-009 experience as well.  I tried the Gungnir MB, Meridian G08, Neko Audio D100, ANK Audiokits 4.1 LE (upgraded unit used by DigitalPete for demos), Teac UD-301 ($299 with rebate at Amazon) with my KGSS-HV/SR-009, and while I much prefer the ANK over the others, they are all more than good enough.  I could have lived with the Teac UD-301 with no complaints.  Just don't get a bright DAC.
 
Sep 23, 2015 at 5:18 PM Post #62 of 834
  Along with the 009's, I also have the SR-003mk2's, to which both earspeakers are driven by the BHSE.
Now I haven't heard the 009's with an SRM-323, but have with an SRM-007t + 717, and I assume the 007t and 717 will probably drive the 009's as good if not better than the 323.
 
So with me knowing the difference in SQ between the 009's and 003mk2's driven by the BHSE, and also knowing how the 009's sounded driven by both Stax amps mentioned, then if I didn't have any stats gear, and I'd only enough to get either the BHSE / SR-003mk2, or SR-009 / SRM-323, I would without doubt get the BHSE / 003mk2, I'd then get the 009's when I'd the money saved.
 
Yes I find the 009's do sound better than the 003mk2's driven by the BHSE, in that the 009's are more open sounding with better separation, but the detail and transparency difference isn't as big as some might think.
 
For me the only downside with the 003mk2's is after so long they become uncomfortable, but they are the best value for money phones I've ever heard, driven by the BHSE that is.
 
P.S. Although I've not heard the KGSSHV Carbon, reading what Birgir has written on his website about his KGSSHV Carbon being up there with the BHSE and DIY T2, then I would also get a KGSSHV Carbon / SR-003mk2 rather than an SR-009 / SRM-323, then again getting the 009's when I'd the money saved.

 
Portable STAX (okay, I know the SR-003MK2 is not compatible with the SRM-002, but you know what I mean) is not on my radar for now. (Though it would be cool to collect every STAX ever made someday.) And I've already owned other STAX systems.
 
An SR-207 + SRM-212 (connected directly from my laptop with no DAC because my laptop sounded just as good as a Schiit Modi 2 DAC) sounded a lot better to me than the Abyss AB-1266 ($5,495), HIFIMAN HE1000 ($2,999), HIFIMAN HE6 (~$1,300), and Sennheiser HD 800 (~$1,600) from a MOON Neo 430HA amp/DAC (~$4,300). (I also heard the HE1000 and HD 800 on a Sennheiser HDVD 800 amp/DAC, which sounded the same to me as the other amp/DAC.)
 
Needless to say, upgrading to the SR-009 is the only logical move for me.
 
The SR-009 is about $2,800 from PriceJapan.com. The SRM-323S is around $550 from the same site or $300-500 on the used market. The BHSE is $6,596 with the upgrade, and would be even more if I bought it new with no wait period, since I have something...sneaky planned.
 
I do not anticipate having much more than $3,000 to spare in the next month or two, so like I said, the SR-009 + SRM-323S is the only combo I am interested in buying this year with that money. BHSE or KGSSHV Carbon can come next year, or potentially in a few months if things go unexpectedly well.
 
Birgir actually said the SRM-323S is the best STAX amp in production. However, he did not specifically say the KGSSHV Carbon is better than or even equal to the BHSE or T2. Here is what he said:
 
Right up there with the BHSE and the T2 as the best amps of their kind

 
"Of their kind" can mean that in their respective (but different) categories, they are the best. The only unambiguous qualitative statements he made were that it is "the best solid state amplifier we have designed" and that it has "the best bass I’ve heard from an electrostatic amp."
 
  I see a lot of this subject on head-fi, not as much on other audio forums like AudioGon. I don't get why folk can't see (hear) that the Source, the Amplifier and the end Speaker / Headphones are all 33.5% of the total SQ you will attain. 
 
To put it more simply, would you expect an Opel Corsa to suddenly out perform a BMW M3 because it has been fitted with the same uprated tyres? No, of course not.
 
In effect, the best headphone in the world tagged on the end of anything short of a great quality source and amplifier will simply reveal all the warts and all. In fact, I would suggest a 507 with a standard Stax amp will sound more balanced than an 009 from a 323 amp. Certainly the 507 will be a more balanced system IMO. The 009 out of a 323 may get fatiguing...

 
Three words, my friend: free parametric equalizer. It's laughably easy to tweak the frequency response of anything.
 
  I'd agree that the amplifier is a far bigger determinant of resulting sound quality with top Staxes than with any dynamic headphones, at least until you get up to the level of a KGSShv. It makes no sense to hold back the 009 with a Stax-made amp -- finding a nice Lambda/Stax amp pairing sorta seems more reasonable. Though I suppose I can see importing a PJ 009 now (well in advance of securing a decent amp) if you're speculating that the exchange rate will get worse in the future.
 
As for DACs, yeah that's important too, but the 3K/Yggy/R2R thing isn't a requirement. Just don't get a bright DAC; not all DS are bright (e.g. Eximus DP1 is nice and warm). I've also been very happy with the lowly NAD M51, which retails at only 2K and can be had for just over 1K used. I have a very nice analog setup for my speakers (Clearaudio Innovation, Graham Phantom, Koetsu Onyx, Ortofon Cadenza, etc), and I haven't felt the need to bring it over to the Stax setup -- the sound from the M51/KGSShv/009 is top notch as-is.

 
The SR-009 on virtually any amp will get much better sound than, say, the SR-207 from the same amp. (And I've already covered how the SR-009 is technically easier to drive than the SR-507, etc.) Anyway...I have no problem at all eventually spending whatever amount of money is necessary to get ultimate sound. I just need to take it one step at a time. I don't mind not getting the best sound immediately. I mean, I want the MSB SELECT DAC (which is over $130,000 with all the upgrades!) someday.
 
Sep 23, 2015 at 11:16 PM Post #63 of 834
I was just taking a look at a classic thread.
 
http://www.head-fi.org/t/582518/electrostatic-amplifiers-voltage-ratings
 
Does anyone know any specs for the KGSSHV Carbon? (I know the output voltage of KGSSHV amps can vary.)
 
Sep 24, 2015 at 7:41 AM Post #64 of 834
400V power, 800vppss
450V power 900vppss
in practice about 20 volts less
 
circlotron is exactly the same
800v power 800vppss
900v power 900vppss
 
I believe I have found a way to bump the voltages up to
600V power, but not tested yet. if I find a current production pnp
rated at more than 600V, then even higher voltage rails.
 
Sep 24, 2015 at 8:01 AM Post #65 of 834
A few observations from a novice. The photos posted of the Carbon, the boards look really tight, some resistors are right up against capacitor casings etc. Is there a reason why it was so compact?
It looks to my untrained eye as though it is tighter gaps than the standard KGSShv boards?
 
Can the 009 and 007 safely take more swing without damage? I guess is is like a bigger amp powerering the same speaker maybe, it sounds more dynamic and relaxed at the same volume (at the headphone/speaker). Makes sense to me.
 
I am very interested in the Carbon, as it sounds like it may be a jump from the KGSShv and as good as the BHSE in some areas? A full test on the Carbon v BHSE with the 009s would be most interesting. I think from my 2 tests at David1961 that the KGSShv has slightly more bass power than the BHSE, the BHSE excels in midrange magic and soundstage width (wider than the KGSShv) All IMO of course, and to my ears in a 2 day demo with the K-01 as a source and using the same 009s.
 
Sep 24, 2015 at 9:06 AM Post #66 of 834
birgir did the original boards to fit in a smaller chassis.

production boards are a fair bit bigger. All resistors are on .2 inch spacing. plenty of room.
 
Sep 24, 2015 at 9:09 AM Post #67 of 834
Got my boards today........ Now for the parts....  
wink_face.gif

 
Sep 24, 2015 at 9:22 AM Post #68 of 834
birgir did the original boards to fit in a smaller chassis.

production boards are a fair bit bigger. All resistors are on .2 inch spacing. plenty of room.


I see, thanks for the clarification. Got me interested even more now....
 
Sep 24, 2015 at 9:41 AM Post #69 of 834
What do you guys think: If I make well over $10K over the next few months, should I skip the KGSSHV Carbon and spend over $7K on the BHSE if given the opportunity to procure it immediately? Just a hypothetical here. I know most of us are working with limited information.
 
Sep 24, 2015 at 9:45 AM Post #70 of 834
If you get the KGSSHV Carbon, you don't have to worry about leaving it on or (shudder) tuberolling.
 
If you get the BHSE, you're getting a GREAT amp and a piece of art all rolled into one.
 
Your bucks - your choice.
 
Sep 24, 2015 at 9:53 AM Post #71 of 834
  If you get the KGSSHV Carbon, you don't have to worry about leaving it on or (shudder) tuberolling.
 
If you get the BHSE, you're getting a GREAT amp and a piece of art all rolled into one.
 
Your bucks - your choice.

 
Gah. At this level of crazy money, I might as well buy both. XD I mean, if I'm going to be spending that much on an amp in the first place, I sure as heck better have ample
floatsmile.png
reserves set aside instead of blowing everything I have on it. But the BHSE takes priority, since it's even more difficult to acquire than the Carbon. If my madness ends up paying off instead of being the ramblings of a dreamer, this thread will have at least one exhaustive comparison of the two amps in the next two to twelve months. lol
 
Sep 24, 2015 at 10:03 AM Post #72 of 834
  If you get the KGSSHV Carbon, you don't have to worry about leaving it on or (shudder) tuberolling.
 
If you get the BHSE, you're getting a GREAT amp and a piece of art all rolled into one.
 
Your bucks - your choice.


I agree with that. The BHSE with tubes has something magical in the midrange and a wider soundstage compared to the KGSShv. The bass on my KGSShv kicks harder, so I could claim it is better for rock and dance. But the tubes in that BHSE, they just do something special, gets you closer to the emotion somehow. It is not just hifi and measurements, it is a connection. 
 
I am a hypocrite as I don't have a BHSE and bought 2 KGSShv's instead. My reason for that are:
 
1. I can not worry about leaving it on (though I do worry about that in June - end August here in Spain, so switch it off when not in use during those months).
2. I don't worry about tube replacements (EL34s, good ones are not cheap, so factor in a healthy 500-800 USD a year).
3. My dogs won't bust the tubes.
4. In theory my amp should prove more reliable at least as regards damage incurred by tube structure failing and shorts from that. Though agreed, the KGSShv has similar parts that can burn out and wear out, and the interior of both amps is more or less the same temperature IMO.
5. Tubes can go out of spec, and do gracefully fail in most cases, thus the output and the current to the final stage will not be constant. Mind it does drift in the KGSShv on warm up.
 
The reasons to buy the BHSE? 
1. Sounds fabulous, can't see anyone arguing about that.
2. Looks amazing.
3. Will become a classic / collectable.
4. Probably the best Stat amp in the world using tubes and in current (commercial) production.
 
If it was me, I would get the BHSE. But again, I haven't heard the Carbon against the BHSE. I am a bit negative about it's chances of being 'better' than the BHSE, it is just so many times I have heard tube amps beat SS. But that is not always the case of course....
 
Sep 24, 2015 at 10:06 AM Post #73 of 834
  I agree with that. The BHSE with tubes has something magical in the midrange and a wider soundstage compared to the KGSShv. The bass on my KGSShv kicks harder, so I could claim it is better for rock and dance. But the tubes in that BHSE, they just do something special, gets you closer to the emotion somehow. It is not just hifi and measurements, it is a connection. 
 
I am a hypocrite as I don't have a BHSE and bought 2 KGSShv's instead. My reason for that are:
 
1. I can not worry about leaving it on (though I do worry about that in June - end August here in Spain, so switch it off when not in use during those months).
2. I don't worry about tube replacements (EL34s, good ones are not cheap, so factor in a healthy 500-800 USD a year).
3. My dogs won't bust the tubes.
4. In theory my amp should prove more reliable at least as regards damage incurred by tube structure failing and shorts from that. Though agreed, the KGSShv has similar parts that can burn out and wear out, and the interior of both amps is more or less the same temperature IMO.
5. Tubes can go out of spec, and do gracefully fail in most cases, thus the output and the current to the final stage will not be constant. Mind it does drift in the KGSShv on warm up.
 
The reasons to buy the BHSE? 
1. Sounds fabulous, can't see anyone arguing about that.
2. Looks amazing.
3. Will become a classic / collectable.
4. Probably the best Stat amp in the world using tubes and in current (commercial) production.
 
If it was me, I would get the BHSE. But again, I haven't heard the Carbon against the BHSE. I am a bit negative about it's chances of being 'better' than the BHSE, it is just so many times I have heard tube amps beat SS. But that is not always the case of course....

 
By the way, when you heard David's BHSE, it was with the Psvane tubes, right? Birgir told me to avoid those particular tubes due to danger of them damaging the amp.
 
Sep 24, 2015 at 10:19 AM Post #74 of 834
   
By the way, when you heard David's BHSE, it was with the Psvane tubes, right? Birgir told me to avoid those particular tubes due to danger of them damaging the amp.

I spent 2 days with David in 2014 and that was with the original Mullard re-issues and then the PS-Vanes.
 
I spent a full day with David in August this year, and it was using the NOS Mullards. David has read about some failures on here to the PS-Vanes, but fortunately had no problems, and doesn't use them now, as he finds the NOS Mullards sound smoother. PM him if you need more info.
 
All this chat about the BHSE, makes me want to hit the deposit button again. I put a deposit down early 2014, but then found Geoff and commissioned a KGSShv off-board 1968 450V 10Ma.
This year I bought another from him, the same amp exactly apart from the volume pot. I use the second amp in my UK system, and the first in my Spanish (main) system. So I may be the only person to buy 2 amps from Geoff... (so far).
 
Thing is, I got burn't with my SETs, the amps blew and I had to get them replaced. I later got fed up and sold them. They did sound fantastic but were in the repair shop as much as in my system. 300Bs are not cheap, as are EL34s. A lot of the new issue tubes are kinda nasty IMO, and negate the reasons to have a tubed output stage. Which leave us running around like idiots buying up NOS tubes. Great if you have the cash and can find a reputable seller...
 
Sep 24, 2015 at 12:30 PM Post #75 of 834
If getting a BHSE to drive 009's, then IMO NOS EL34's are a must, Psvane PH's also make the 009's sound very good, but the ones I used didn't last that long, well they did last a year but I'd have expected them to last a lot longer.
I still have a second quad of PH's, which I got after being happy with how the first quad solved the treble problem I heard from the 009's while using the stock Mullard's and SED's, but since getting the Mullard xf4's I stopped using that second quad of PH's, I was going to use that second quad until they packed up, but find the xf4's make the 009's sound better than the PH's, they're probably more reliable too.

Like mentioned, with the BHSE having tubes, leaving it on unattended isn't advisable, or at least it's something I'd never do, which is why my next stats amp is going to be a SS, I'll still be keeping the BHSE, but I'd be happy to leave a SS on without being there.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top