Razoramus
100+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2006
- Posts
- 342
- Likes
- 10
Quote:
^^
Agreed, there is even less detail in the marshmallows compared to EP-630s. However the marshmallows are superior to the EP-630s in SQ in terms of balance and smoothness. I didn't find an acceptable in ear phone until the ER6, the E2c's sound didn't work for me. Portability's price is SQ. The KSC75s are really something.
Originally Posted by facelvega /img/forum/go_quote.gif I find that an ep-630/cx300 is also noticeably weaker than the KSC-75 in SQ. No question, really: the detail resolution is two removes better. Cheap canalphones aren't entry-level hifi, they're acceptable midfi that fill an important gap for cheap portability. |
^^
Agreed, there is even less detail in the marshmallows compared to EP-630s. However the marshmallows are superior to the EP-630s in SQ in terms of balance and smoothness. I didn't find an acceptable in ear phone until the ER6, the E2c's sound didn't work for me. Portability's price is SQ. The KSC75s are really something.