Ozric
500+ Head-Fier
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2002
- Posts
- 570
- Likes
- 10
I give up
Originally Posted by Jahn So basically they are asking folks to step up to an A/B box, and from the same source and same cans, they are going to switch back and forth from a crap amp and a great amp, and ask folks to be able to tell which one is the crap amp? um, shouldn't this be easy? if the source and cables and cans and music itself are highly revealing that is? |
Originally Posted by Jahn So basically they are asking folks to step up to an A/B box, and from the same source and same cans, they are going to switch back and forth from a crap amp and a great amp, and ask folks to be able to tell which one is the crap amp? um, shouldn't this be easy? if the source and cables and cans and music itself are highly revealing that is? |
Originally Posted by Ozric Well, without derailing this thread into discussion about miracles or other stuff with religious undertones, let me just say this: these folks are monks, who in the spirit of renunciation don't concern themselves with the outside affairs of the world. And what they achieve through their meditative practice and spiritual discipline has far more positive influence on the world (in the purest sense; like the butterfly effect) than a paltry $1 million ever could. In any case, $1 million isn't really going to have any sort of impact on hunger or poverty in the third world, for example. |
Originally Posted by Kixyll From reading it over, I don't think the challenge is over actual audio components. Seems to be stuff like Shakti Stones, magic foil, drawing a red "x" on a CD and chanting the pledge of allegiance 7 times, etc. |
Originally Posted by Patrickhat2001 I'm all for the scientific study of audio and would really like to see some of the above mentioned products officially de bunked. But what's the point? Most educated people already know to stay away from such products. But ewwww! look at the statement Randi wrote concerning what his colleage Paul Ierymenko told him--"He maintained that any reasonable quality amplifier, operating within its specified limits, is acoustically indistinguishable from any other." Now that is a complete load of bull! That's just what we need, very educated people who are ignorant of a certain subject passing along their ignorance of the subject to the general public. |
Originally Posted by Patrickhat2001 "He maintained that any reasonable quality amplifier, operating within its specified limits, is acoustically indistinguishable from any other." |
Originally Posted by bln What does any of that have to do with snake oil? It'll just get the thread closed or too argumentative to be of use. I was interested in this one too. |