Quote:
Originally posted by absolutofft
I was thinking about changing headphones to a hair of grados, did you think the grados had a more forward sound? what about the build quality? and don't they have a pad that rests on the ear as oppose to cupping the ear? |
it took some time to break them in. i spent a week away, and let them run with "A Meeting by the River". they smoothed out considerably. until they're broken in, the high end can be irritating on some CDs, but not all.
- the 325 is more forward; the graphs on the HeadRoom site match what i hear. since my ears are on the high side of 40, i don't find this "wrong". i also suspect that the notions of forward, soundstage, and detail derive from the rising high end.
- their build is solid. i haven't stood up from a chair with my foot on the cable, so i don't know how good the strain relief is. but you do get your money's worth. some folks complain that the cable is short at 6 feet. i had a kimber extension, so this is not an issue.
- the pad is "supra-aural" which means it does sit on the ear. i wear glasses, and i had to fiddle with the band to reduce the pinch of the ear on the glasses frame. the grado won't be as comfortable as the 580/600; or the sony 3000; or any oval around the ear pad. on the other hand, they're way less bulky. i don't try to listen for hours at a time; generally one CD at a time, so they don't get uncomfortable.
i e-mailed equinox about the replacement cable, and was advised that my original copper 600s (1998 production) would always have the socket problem. from the traffic here, the conventional wisdom is that Sennheiser changed the design around 1999/2000, using an aluminum driver and revised socket. it may be that the problem really didn't go away.
in the end, i find the sound more "accurate" from the 325 than i did from the 580/600. and i got tired of the intermittancy of the senns.