Quote:
Originally posted by MacDEF
Same design issue as the regular iPod: size. Rio Nitrus is 4.32 cubic inches, iPod mini is 3.6 cubic inches. That's .72 cubic inches. That's a lot of battery. (Although I think they should have made it even .1 inch thicker, just to get more battery life. I don't care about 8 hours, but a lot of people seem to, even if they never actually need it.)
|
I would agree, a 0.1 inch thickness tradeoff would have been good for battery life (if things could be arranged that way). Battery life was one of the major detractors incenting me to turn in my ipod for the ihp-120. That and directory structure.
Besides all of the recent hi-tech MP3 players, I am also the owner of numerous older ones including the Archos MM player. My experience with that player is that battery life started around 7-8 hours and after a year or so I was dealing with 5 or 6 hours, or less, and that's a big issue. When using it outside in the cold (skiing or hiking), that 5 or 6 even gets shorter. So battery life can be a big big issue for many of us. Plus, I think as others have said, the more you have to recharge it, the shorter it's lifetime in years as well.
Quote:
This is a bit of a myth. The battery life really doesn't get "shorter" until the end of the life cycle. And the lifespans on an 8-hour and a 15-hour battery are pretty much identical. Lithium ion batteries have lives based on charging cycles -- sure, some people may let their 15-hour battery run down longer before charging, but for most users, they'll charge when it's convenient, not when they get to a certain battery level, which means most users will charge them about at about the same frequency, which means the batteries will have about the same lifespan.
|
Not that I want a debate, but I'm not so sure about this assumption. I let mine run down substantially before recharging (1 bar). Especially since I've heard that it's the number of deep charge cycles (not top off) which determines the batteries life. If I run my player 6 hours a day, I'd be recharging an ipod every day and the iriver maybe every 2nd or 3rd day. Seems like this would make the lifetime of the ipod 1/2-1/3 that of the iriver (in days/weeks/years) and increases it's use cost.
Quote:
The advantage of a longer battery life really has nothing to do with the "lifespan" of the battery; it's all about the maximum length of time you can listen between charges.
|
I think they're both related. Longer listening time between charges will increase the batteries practical lifespan in days/weeks/years for the same listening time.
Quote:
"Majority opinion?" For those of us who have heard multiple players, the "majority" I've seen says that the iPod and the Zen are the best sounding. The Karma's sound wasn't that impressive, IMO. Whatever the case may be, it's certainly not the case that there's some "majority" out there preferring the sound of the Karma. |
Another point where I don't think you'll ever get any concensus and people will always have different opinions or different loyalties. I've owned the ipod G3, archos FM, archos MM, RIO Karma and Iriver ihp-120.
The sound of the ipod and Karma and Archos are really pretty close to each other. IM"Very"HO I would give the edge to the Karma with the ipod and archos a very close second. Between the Karma and ihp-120 I would say it's a tossup. The Karma sounds better at lower bitrates (where some equalization might provide benefit) but I believe the ihp sounds best at higher bitrates with no equalization (alt preset extreme). Again, just my very humble opinion. The Karma can also drive 580s pretty well, when I don't think any other player can.
I love the slick ipod interfaces and would love to have one if they would provide longer battery life... Sound isn't that different where it's a deal breaker for me.
The Karma wheel broke on me after a short time and I couldn't get my rio contact to return my e-mails (even though I did beta testing for them) so back it went for a refund (CC) after 2 months.. There are benefits to buying from local box stores
.
Peace