I have the Timeless 1, and it is also interesting, but I find it less resolving and thinner, with poorer bass, poorer treble, and not as good mids. Some might come from what we see in these graphs, but much of the difference likely lies in other elements of their execution, including possibly a different driver or the same driver with tweaks. They certainly have some secret sauce that makes their IEMs very effective.
I had given up listening to the Timeless 1 because my other units were better balanced, tonally, and timbrally. But the Quantum beats all those units!
Weirdly, the Quantum is making me look again at the Grand Maestro. However, I do not see this one leaving my rotation.
However, be aware of recency biases, which are psychoacoustic. So if I grab my Monarch mkIII alone, it sounds slightly treble biased with good mids and decent bass. When I listen to it after the Quantum, it sounds shrill, with bad bass and exaggerated mids. The Quantum is, to me, the more realistic device. The MkIII is not bad, but it is different. Everything seems different!